| New Reply |
Fusion with help of accelerators? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May8-12, 02:03 PM | #35 |
|
|
Fusion with help of accelerators?
What is principal difference between inertial fusion and accelerator/plasma focus fusion?
Why you cannot easily acheive conditions in former similar to the first? Could you create some local thermonuclear explosions with beam fusion? |
| May8-12, 02:40 PM | #36 |
|
|
|
| May8-12, 08:53 PM | #37 |
|
|
|
| May8-12, 09:04 PM | #38 |
|
|
|
| May9-12, 09:56 AM | #39 |
|
|
|
| May9-12, 03:12 PM | #40 |
|
|
|
| May9-12, 03:26 PM | #41 |
|
|
|
| May9-12, 03:40 PM | #42 |
|
|
|
| May10-12, 08:05 PM | #43 |
|
|
Another inertial confinement scheme involves using tabletop lasers to accelerate ions from a solid target into another target of D-T fuel. If you shoot an ultra intense laser pulse at a thin solid target, you can accelerate ions from the rear-side of the target via a process called Target Normal Sheath Acceleration. The laser pulse immediately ionizes the target into plasma. As the laser pulse propagates through the target, electromagnetic fields from the laser pulse drive electrons toward the back of the target which then form a sheath. The resulting charge segregation region between the electron sheath and the rest of the target set up a strong electric field which accelerates the ions.
If this target happens to contain, say some deuteron atoms, then you'll get MeV-KeV deuterons travelling toward the D-T fuel. They will then proceed to conveniently fuse with deuterons in the fuel. DD Fusion! |
| May10-12, 08:10 PM | #44 |
|
|
Yes but like Beam-Beam fusion, the reactions are much too sparse compared to scattering events.
|
| May15-12, 10:58 PM | #45 |
|
|
What is progress with fast ignition approach in which fuel is compressed with light ion beams and ignited with picosecond laser?Is it far from a positive net gain?
|
| May16-12, 07:22 AM | #46 |
|
|
The parameters for the ion beam have been met in individual experiments but not in the same experiment as far as I know.
The Sandia website has some good information regarding progress on the topic. |
| May16-12, 04:12 PM | #47 |
|
|
Is it possible to combine dense plasma focus and fast ignition approaches?
They claim that plasma focus is very dense.If so, it could be easily ignited with picosecond laser and thermonuclear explosion should happen? |
| Feb6-13, 09:38 PM | #48 |
|
|
In a dense plasma focus, you essentially have a coaxial electrode system. One end is insulated and a huge amount of current is released in a microsecond from a marx generator. The plasma sheath propagates up like a plasma gun (lorentz force) and at the top of the electrode system, some hydrodynamic shock effects occur which result in the formation of an extremely dense plasma column. Fusion occurs, although the lifetime is of the order of nanoseconds due to instabilities.
The dense plasma focus is useful as a neutron source. It would be difficult to focus the laser pulse into the exact location of the plasma column at the correct time. |
| Feb15-13, 07:18 PM | #49 |
|
|
Also at least some experiments with heating of plasma focus with laser seem already been conducted and quite successful. http://jap.aip.org/resource/1/japiau...sAuthorized=no http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=get...fier=AD0910345 So it seem to be principally possible back in 1970-es. Another question: if it is assumed that entire plasma focus device is filled with ambient deuterium gas how they suppose to prevent reactor walls melting through convection and gas heating? |
| Feb15-13, 08:40 PM | #50 |
|
|
|
| Feb15-13, 08:45 PM | #51 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Fusion with help of accelerators?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| is General Fusion and Magnetized target fusion legit? | Nuclear Engineering | 16 | ||
| Circular accelerators vs Linear Accelerators | General Physics | 5 | ||
| Standing Wave Accelerators Vs Travelling Wave Accelerators | Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework | 0 | ||
| Accelerators and fusion of elements | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 5 | ||
| Why not particle accelerators for fusion? | Nuclear Engineering | 19 | ||