New Reply

Interesting Coincidence with Classical/Modern View of Mass and Energy

 
Share Thread
Jun12-12, 02:54 AM   #1
 

Interesting Coincidence with Classical/Modern View of Mass and Energy


Has anyone ever noticed that, even in classical physics, energy is shown as a scalar multiple of mass?

For example, consider the joule;

1 J = 1 kg*(m/s)^2

If you consider the units of motion (m/s) to be a vector quantity, then squaring such a vector would be interpreted as a dot product that produces a scalar.

1 J (energy) = [mass in kg]*[scalar speed]

Which is eerily similar to E=MC^2. Thus, whether anyone in the past realized it or not, did they inadvertently stumble on the mass-energy equivalence just by dealing with these units?
PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Kenneth Wilson, Nobel winner for physics, dies
>> Two collider research teams find evidence of new particle Zc(3900)
>> Scientists make first direct images of topological insulator's edge currents
Jun12-12, 04:39 AM   #2
 
The units in a physical formula actually do work out? What a coincidence!
Jun12-12, 04:56 AM   #3
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Creepy!
Jun12-12, 09:58 AM   #4
mfb
 
Mentor

Interesting Coincidence with Classical/Modern View of Mass and Energy


If you set the speed of light to 1, mass and energy have the same units. This is not a coincidence, and shows that the concepts are related in relativity.

If, for some strange reason, nonrelativistic kinetic energy would be something like mv^3, the rest energy of objects should be something like mc^3. But I do not think this would give meaningful physics.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Interesting Coincidence with Classical/Modern View of Mass and Energy
Thread Forum Replies
Modern Physics view of Length Contraction? Special & General Relativity 50
What's the modern view on ur theory? (Is there one?) Beyond the Standard Model 5
Modern view: a history of science? General Discussion 4
Interesting Numerical Coincidence in GSW General Physics 0
Inertia and momentum, the modern view. General Physics 6