| New Reply |
Determinat formula in Einstein notation |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul10-12, 10:06 PM | #1 |
|
|
Determinat formula in Einstein notation
Hi all,
I've been looking around at formulae for determinants (using them for tensor densities) and I just want to clarify that the expression below is correct (i.e. formulae are correct): [tex] |M| = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{1a_1}M_{2a_2} \ldots M_{na_n} = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{a_11}M_{a_22} \ldots M_{a_nn}[/tex] The reason I ask is that the second formulae lends itself to Einstein notation: [tex] |M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_1M^{a_2}{}_2 \ldots M^{a_n}{}_n[/tex] As an aside question, is this correct in the sense that there are unmatched indices on each side of the equation? I have found the following formula which seems to correct this: [tex] \epsilon_{b_1b_2 \ldots b_n}|M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1}M^{a_2}{}_{b_2} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}[/tex] I think they are both correct...? Cheers |
| Jul10-12, 10:42 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Try
[tex]|M| = \frac{1}{n!} \varepsilon^{b_1 \ldots b_n} \varepsilon_{a_1 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}[/tex] |
| Jul10-12, 10:48 PM | #3 |
|
|
Also, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi-Ci...l#Determinants does this not imply that my second formula is equivalent to yours? |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Determinat formula in Einstein notation
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| determinant formula with einstein notation proof | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Einstein Notation | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||
| EINSTEIN Summation notation | Differential Geometry | 3 | ||
| Einstein Notation | General Math | 2 | ||
| einstein notation | Advanced Physics Homework | 28 | ||