| New Reply |
particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog) |
Share Thread |
| Jul10-12, 05:13 PM | #1 |
|
|
particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)
hi all,
I've been trying to work this problem out, [itex]\frac{dv}{dt}-A(B-v)^{1.6}=G [/itex] A, B and G are constants and Matlab can't give me a solution either. I'm wondering if there is even a solution? |
| Jul10-12, 09:15 PM | #2 |
|
|
Hi,
Just realised I can make an assumption for B = 0. Does this make it solvable? |
| Jul11-12, 02:43 AM | #3 |
|
|
Hi !
The ODe is of the "separables variables" kind (see in attachment) : |
| Jul11-12, 03:27 PM | #4 |
|
|
particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)
wow! thanks
|
| Jul11-12, 03:38 PM | #5 |
|
|
Sorry, there was a typo at the end of the attached page :
|
| Jul11-12, 06:25 PM | #6 |
|
|
Since v represents velocity, can I then integrate the v-equation? Are inv. Beta functions integratable?
Or would it be simpler to determine the x-position by setting up the original equation as a second order derivative as: d2xdt2−A(B−v)^1.6=G and as B = 0 then [itex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+A(\frac{dx}{dt})^{1.6}=G[/itex] with initial conditions dx/dt(0) = 0 i.e. particle initially at rest Sorry to ask again, but could you show me this solution? I really struggle with maths. |
| Jul12-12, 01:36 AM | #7 |
|
|
Hi !
If B=0 your basic equation dv/dt−A(−v)^1.6=G implies v<0 or v=0. If not, (-v)^1.6 would not be real and the solution v(t) would not be real, which is not correct on a physical point of view. So v<0 or v=0. In the general solution given in my preceeding post, let c=0 and B=0 in the formula. Then Y(0)=0 ; Inverse Beta (0) = 0 which leads to v=0. The expected solution with condition v=0 at t=0 is obtained with c=0 in the formula. The function v(t) is not a simple Inverse Beta function, but a combination of several functions with the Inverse Beta among them. It's far too complicated for formal integration. I think that the only practical way is numerical integration. If it is that what you want, the simplest way is probably to use a numerical process for solving directly the differential equation. |
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| nonlinear, ode |
Similar discussions for: particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Help with nonlinear 1st order ODE | Differential Equations | 3 | ||
| 2nd order nonlinear DE | Differential Equations | 0 | ||
| 3rd order nonlinear ODE | Differential Equations | 4 | ||
| nonlinear first order DE | Differential Equations | 22 | ||
| need help with nonlinear 2nd order DE | Differential Equations | 8 | ||