New Reply

particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)

 
Share Thread
Jul10-12, 05:13 PM   #1
 

particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)


hi all,

I've been trying to work this problem out,

[itex]\frac{dv}{dt}-A(B-v)^{1.6}=G [/itex]

A, B and G are constants

and Matlab can't give me a solution either. I'm wondering if there is even a solution?
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jul10-12, 09:15 PM   #2
 
Hi,

Just realised I can make an assumption for B = 0. Does this make it solvable?
Jul11-12, 02:43 AM   #3
 
Hi !
The ODe is of the "separables variables" kind (see in attachment) :
Attached Thumbnails
ODE Beta.JPG  
Jul11-12, 03:27 PM   #4
 

particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)


wow! thanks
Jul11-12, 03:38 PM   #5
 
Sorry, there was a typo at the end of the attached page :
Attached Thumbnails
ODE Beta.JPG  
Jul11-12, 06:25 PM   #6
 
Since v represents velocity, can I then integrate the v-equation? Are inv. Beta functions integratable?

Or would it be simpler to determine the x-position by setting up the original equation as a second order derivative as:

d2xdt2−A(B−v)^1.6=G

and as B = 0 then

[itex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+A(\frac{dx}{dt})^{1.6}=G[/itex]
with initial conditions
dx/dt(0) = 0

i.e. particle initially at rest

Sorry to ask again, but could you show me this solution? I really struggle with maths.
Jul12-12, 01:36 AM   #7
 
Hi !

If B=0 your basic equation dv/dt−A(−v)^1.6=G implies v<0 or v=0. If not, (-v)^1.6 would not be real and the solution v(t) would not be real, which is not correct on a physical point of view. So v<0 or v=0.
In the general solution given in my preceeding post, let c=0 and B=0 in the formula. Then Y(0)=0 ; Inverse Beta (0) = 0 which leads to v=0.
The expected solution with condition v=0 at t=0 is obtained with c=0 in the formula.

The function v(t) is not a simple Inverse Beta function, but a combination of several functions with the Inverse Beta among them. It's far too complicated for formal integration. I think that the only practical way is numerical integration. If it is that what you want, the simplest way is probably to use a numerical process for solving directly the differential equation.
New Reply

Tags
nonlinear, ode

Similar discussions for: particle motion ode (1st order nonlinear nonhomog)
Thread Forum Replies
Help with nonlinear 1st order ODE Differential Equations 3
2nd order nonlinear DE Differential Equations 0
3rd order nonlinear ODE Differential Equations 4
nonlinear first order DE Differential Equations 22
need help with nonlinear 2nd order DE Differential Equations 8