Register to reply 
FEM derivation for plates on elastic foundation ? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jun1612, 04:52 PM

P: 64

Hi All,
I'm familiar with the theory of how the soil can represented by means of FEM and how soilstructure interaction is being established. Most of books are pointing out at the Winkler springs implemented mostly for beams and quadrilaterals (4 node) FEM elements. There are obviously other methods e.g. twoparameter modified Vlasov foundation which in my idea is best approximation. If it isn't the best, at least it's better than Winkler. The approach for deriving the stiffness matrices for Vlasov foundaiton are identical to those of ReissnerMindlin plates, where transverse shear is being taken into account. In order to, represent the vertical and horizontal spring coeff. of soil, corresponding spring coefficients should be found through strain energy equation. The displacements are given as : u(x,y,z), v(x,y,z), w(x,y,z)=w(x,y)*[itex]\phi(z)[/itex] Where [itex]\phi(z)[/itex] is mode shape but not the one obtained from eigenmode analysis, simply, mode shape that gives the variation of the deflection in the zdirection. For example [itex]\phi(0)[/itex]=1.0, [itex]\phi(H)[/itex]=0 Obtainig the spring coefficients is: for vertical spring coeffcient k=[itex]\int^{H}_{0}E*(∂\phi/∂z)^2*dz[/itex] for horizontal spring coefficient 2t = [itex]\int^{H}_{0}G*(\phi)^2*dz[/itex] Stiffness matrix for vertical direction is formed by: Minimizing the strain energy by respect to each component of displacement vector. (U_{k})_{e}=1/2[itex]\int[w(x,y)^T*k*w(x,y)*dA][/itex] and [K^{e}_{k}]_{ij}=∂(U_{k})_{e}^{2} / ( ∂^{2}wi*∂^{2}wj) similar procedure is valid horizontal stiffness matrix Having those in hand, I wish to addopt that for triangular FEM element which has the shape function as : Ni =ai +bi*x+ci*y where ai, bi, and ci are known from nodal coordinates. My question is, how can that be addopted to the energy equations and how am I supposed to get derivates for dz where I don't have the any representation for Zdirection in my shape function for triangular element? Your helps will be appreciated! Regards, 


#2
Jul1112, 01:18 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,101

How about doing it in 2D by borrowing elements from plane stress/strain or carrying out the whole exercise in 3D (going for example for wedge or tetrahedral elements, would probably be almost simplest for bilinear bricks)?



#3
Jul1112, 04:53 PM

P: 33

I haven't done FE in a while and admittedly have never done any work on elastic foundations for FEM, so I will probably not be of too much help here. However, my thought is: do you think you really can do it in 2D? It is a 3D problem, with deflection in the vertical direction and a simple bilinear plane stress/plane strain element is really intended to model something that doesn't deflect in the direction perpendicular to the plane (although I may have gone wrong here, correct me if I have  as I said, I haven't done this in a while). Maybe a shell element could do here, or as PerennialII pointed out, doing it all in 3D.



#4
Jul1512, 12:46 PM

P: 64

FEM derivation for plates on elastic foundation ?
Thanks in advance,
I agree with you that can be solved with 3D elements. Since all of the 1D, 2D problems are a special case of 3D problems. In most of my test problems hexas nicely converges with 2D planar elements results. But this time I've kindly need to ask you, do you have an hexahedron subdivision algorithm for spatial volumes? I deliberetely searched internet for weeks about simple quad subdivision algorithms(including opensource project) the only thing that I come up was triangle subdivision and commercial subdivisions which costs almost a luxury car pricem which I can't afford. It seems that I'm familiar with the theory but don't understand it throughly bit by bit, formulation/programming phase of problem is of course another issue. Generally we obtain the stiffness matrix from kinetic, potential energy equation, so what's equilibrium equation(PDE) for? FEM books says that transition is made from weighted residual method or Galerkin approach, but it's not so clear for me. Your comments will be appreciated, 


#5
Jul1712, 02:59 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,101

If you've access to FE related journals can find reviews which will help, was just looking at Cubit and gmsh meshers for something else and those actually have something which relate to this topic, on a principal level:
http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~tautg...10.04.day1.pdf http://geuz.org/gmsh/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Meshmodule There are a large number of meshing libraries out there which can use as a reference or the library explicitly, like libmesh, meshlab, mesquite, tetgen, gmsh, cubit, triangle , or you might check this if already haven't: http://www.robertschneiders.de/meshg.../software.html In brief, the weighted residual / Galerkin approach is a fairly general way for formulating the weak form and the balance equations, starting from the PDE. Derivations based on potential energy (or virtual work/power, variational approaches) are an another way to formulate the finite element method, and in certain cases these are all equivalent (the potential energy approach for example having its intrinsic limitations and range of application). 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
String on Elastic Foundation  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  1  
What is the force exerted on an elastic object, on elastic collision?  Introductory Physics Homework  5  
The Foundation of mathematics  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  4  
Beam/plate on elastic foundation..?  General Engineering  4  
A beam/plate on elastic foundation....  Advanced Physics Homework  0 