Real Life Ghosts

zoobyshoe

No, the thread title is Real Life Ghosts, not Real Live Ghosts, so the proper correction, if one is needed (which is debatable), would be Real Afterlife Ghosts.

thumpy

but can you use the word" REAL"

Ryan_m_b

Even if we assume that people aren't lying and are in good mental health that doesn't mean their experience was real. It could be a visual illusion (think seeing a person in the corner of your eye that turns out to be a coat on a chair) or even confabulation.

Furthermore most anecdotes of ghostly experience come as you have presented them; many accountings of unexplained noises, movements etc which build up an expectation in the person that something is connecting all these things. This leads to confirmation bias and if there is already the assumption that the supernatural is a valid hypothesis then anything strange is used as evidence for this hypothesis.

If you want a scientific explanation it's not physics you need to look to but psychology and neuroscience.

Ivan Seeking

His account is far more detailed than a simple flash out of the corner of the eye. Also, he claims two people saw it. How does your explanation speak to his account?

Ryan_m_b

It doesn't but it wasn't intended to (note the section of the post I was responding to). I was addressing supernatural accounts broadly, his account I have no explanation for.

zoobyshoe

I reread the opening post a couple times and I think what he implies by using the term "real life" is "non-fictional". "Fictional" would be ghosts as depicted in movies and novels, which, of course, don't have to be debunked, it being understood they're invented for dramatic purposes. "Real life ghosts" are the anecdotes of apparitions that come from "real life" as opposed to movies, etc. The adjective "real" modifies the noun "life", not "ghosts", and the two words together become what's called a compound adjective:

http://www.grammar-monster.com/lesso...adjectives.htm

You can see from that link he should have put a hyphen between "real" and "life" to be completely correct, which would make the corrected thread title, "Real-Life Ghosts". So, you can use the word "real" here, in your compound adjective, without automatically meaning you think the ghosts are real.

zoobyshoe

Just to be clear, the section you selected from thumpy's post actually comes from the OP. Thumpy copied and pasted it without even using quotation marks.

SpringCreek

I recommend The Third Man Factor by John Geiger. Here's a synopsis article from the Daily Mail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-survive.html

zoobyshoe

The sense of a presence is a relatively frequently reported simple partial seizure symptom. I'm glad the article offered the electrically stimulated epileptic woman as evidence this isn't necessarily supernatural at all. This might or might not come into play when someone "sees" a ghost. The erroneously triggered sense of a presence might, in some cases, lead to the visual hallucination of a person.

thumpy

psychologists. i have as much faith in them as i do ghosts.

Ryan_m_b

You shouldn't be employing faith anyway to determine truth but if I take it that you meant that as a figure of speech may I humbly suggest that you are suffering from a grave ignorance.

nombusoz

Thanks guy for your help

thumpy

sorry. my exwife left me for a psychologist. i was just venting. besides, psychology suggests ,to me, that its mental. i trjuly do not believe what i saw was imagination. i am, like the person that started this thread, want to try to understand what i physically saw.

Drakkith

There are several possibilities, but you have already stated you don't think it was imaginary or mental, which are the only possibilities that science says there could be. If it was actually a ghost, meaning the spirit of a person who has died, then it is currently beyond science until one can be observed and evidence reliably recorded. Science doesn't say that ghosts CANNOT exist, only that we haven't observed them. We have immense mountains of evidence of other things that have been the cause for some people's alleged ghosts, such as a multitude of mental factors, and based on the available evidence "real ghosts" do not exist. If in the future reliable evidence comes forth that ghosts do in fact exist, then they will be incorporated into the body of knowledge that science helps build and interpret.

zoobyshoe

Thumpy, you had a pretty bad experience with a psychologist so you have a bias against psychology. That's pretty psychological, I hope you see. Hehe.

I'm half kidding. But only half. It seems what really probably bothers you about the notion of a "mental" explanation is what bothers everyone about it: it would mean we can't always trust our senses. That's a very hard thing for most people to face. We want to believe our senses give us 100% accurate information, or at least that we can always tell somehow when they aren't, that there's always some clue or tell-tale when we're experiencing an illusion of any kind.

thumpy

thats exactly it. if the other person hadnt seen the same thing then i would have thought "great, now im seeing thing" but i wasnt alone. and since i lied to her and said i didnt see anything theres no way either one of us influenced the other. and her description was so detailed. at firrst when i saw "it" i thought it was a real guy walking towards the car from the left side of the sstreet . about the time he reached the center of the hood he disappeared like a misty cloud of steam. and im just going insane trying to rationilze it without admitting it was just my imagination. and for the heck of it i had a freind of a freindask a pshycologist about ghosts and he believed in em. so from one pshycologists point of view. ghosts exist.

zoobyshoe

Ever seen this Derren Brown demonstration of hypnosis?: