| New Reply |
Integration of the reciprocal lattice |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug1-12, 08:56 PM | #1 |
|
|
Integration of the reciprocal lattice
I am studying Solid state physics from kittel and I am stuck at the following equation. I can see that the exponential term turns to the kroneckler delta, but I dont understand how the integral gives the volume of the specimen, Ω? What am I not seeing?
∫d3x f(x)eiK.x = [itex]\sum[/itex] aG∫d3x ei(K+G).x = Ω[itex]\sum[/itex]aGδk,-G f(x) is the fourier transform of the lattice, ie. the reciprocal lattice and he wants to prove that integration is not zero unless k is a vector in the reciprocal lattice G |
| Aug2-12, 11:36 AM | #2 |
|
|
If k = -G, then the value in the exponential is zero, which means your integral reduces to the integral of just d^3x, which is going to result in the volume of the space over which the integration occurs.
|
| Aug2-12, 01:21 PM | #3 |
|
|
I see it now.
Is there any significance to the fact that k=-G? That is, k is in the opposite direction of the reciprocal lattice vector G |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Integration of the reciprocal lattice
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Reciprocal Lattice | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 2 | ||
| primitive lattice vectors, reciprocal lattice, wigner seitz cell | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 1 | ||
| Reciprocal lattice??? | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 1 | ||
| reciprocal lattice | Advanced Physics Homework | 8 | ||
| Reciprocal lattice | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 7 | ||