New Reply

Definition of closed sets

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct3-12, 10:57 AM   #1
 

Definition of closed sets


Good day!

Im currently reading the book of Steven R. Lay's "Analysis with an Introduction to Proof, 3rd ed.". According to his book, if a subset S of ℝ contains all of its boundary then it is closed. But i find this wrong since if we consider S={xεQ;0≤x≤2}, then it can be shown that S contains all of its boundary points (using the fact the Q is dense in ℝ), but it is not closed since the closure of S is the interval [0,2] which is not equal to the set itself. am i correct?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Oct3-12, 11:05 AM   #2
 
Quote by kimkibun View Post
Good day!

Im currently reading the book of Steven R. Lay's "Analysis with an Introduction to Proof, 3rd ed.". According to his book, if a subset S of ℝ contains all of its boundary then it is closed. But i find this wrong since if we consider S={xεQ;0≤x≤2}, then it can be shown that S contains all of its boundary points (using the fact the Q is dense in ℝ), but it is not closed since the closure of S is the interval [0,2] which is not equal to the set itself. am i correct?
Is √2 a boundry point of S? Is it in S?
Oct3-12, 02:52 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Because, as you say, Q is dense in the real numbers, every irrational number between 0 and 2 (in fact, every number in S as well) is a boundary point, not just 0 and 2. S is NOT closed because it does not contain the irrational numbers. The closure of S is the interval [0, 2] including all rational and irrational numbers in that interval.
Oct8-12, 12:04 AM   #4
 

Definition of closed sets


May not be relevant, but you should also check which "space" you are in. In the space Q, the closure of S is S. In R, the closure of S is [0,1].
Oct8-12, 07:28 PM   #5
 
Elaborating on algebrat's response, "closed subset" is a relative concept, depending on what topological space that subset is embedded in. (Obviously "open subset" is relative to the larger space as well.) This is in contrast to a property like compactness, which is intrinsic.
New Reply

Tags
real analysis, topology
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Definition of closed sets
Thread Forum Replies
closed separated sets in disjoint open sets Calculus & Beyond Homework 10
3 questions concerning open and closed sets for sets having to do with sequence space Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
examples of infinite/arbitrary unions of closed sets that remain closed. Topology and Analysis 3
Finite intersection of closed sets is not necessarily closed Differential Geometry 2
closed set, compact set, and a definition of distance between sets Calculus & Beyond Homework 1