| New Reply |
xi decay quarks conserved but flavour not conserved |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov13-12, 07:12 AM | #1 |
|
|
xi decay quarks conserved but flavour not conserved
Hi
I have been looking into particle physics and i came across this question but i can not find the answer, the quetsion is as follows: the xi particle decays into the following [itex]\Xi -> \wedge + \Pi^{-}[/itex] dds -> sud + [itex]\overline{u}d [/itex] the quark numbers are conserved but the flavours are not conserved. I cannot understand why the flavours are not conserved. Can anyone help me? |
| Nov13-12, 07:38 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
Looks conserved to me. The long lifetime (~10-10s) is suspicious. |
| Nov13-12, 07:53 AM | #3 |
|
|
It says on it why isnt it conserved and is it decayed by strong or weak forces.
I would say weak because flavours are not conserved but by looking at it, it seems to be conserved |
| Nov13-12, 08:10 AM | #4 |
|
Mentor
|
xi decay quarks conserved but flavour not conserved
Well, it is easy to draw a diagram for the strong interaction.
The long lifetime indicates that those diagrams are problematic in terms of parity, or cancel each other partially, or something else. Edit @Bill_K's post: Oh, that explains everything. And ##\Sigma^-## with dds is too light to decay into ##\Lambda + \pi## |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: xi decay quarks conserved but flavour not conserved
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Why is momentum conserved but kinetic energy not conserved in an inelastic collision? | General Physics | 1 | ||
| do up and down quarks obey flavour quantum conservation? | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 7 | ||
| Dirac conserved current vs Klein-Gordon conserved current | Quantum Physics | 14 | ||
| Jumping on a trampoline and energy conserved/ not conserved | Introductory Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| Momentum conserved and energy isn't conserved? | Introductory Physics Homework | 18 | ||