intuition about definition of laplace transformby learner07 Tags: definition, intuition, laplace, transform 

#1
Nov2812, 05:32 AM

P: 6

why was laplace transform developed i have googled it and found that it is something about shaping a family of exponential and vector projections etc i couldn't get it. some simply said that it was used to make a linear differential equation to algebraic equation but i couldn't understand how the variable t(time ) went in and how the 's' variable popped out. could you guys please explain me about how this laplace transform actually works? and when u say L(1)=1/s what does that actually mean ?
thanks in advance 



#2
Nov2812, 05:43 AM

P: 15

The simplest way of understand Laplace transform is to understand Fourier transform.
Laplace transform is Fourier transform of exponential decay multiply by the given function. This happened because we cannot Fourier transform some functions (the value goes to infinity) therefore we multiply it with an exponential decay first, then transform it, this method is called "Laplace Transform" Hope this help 



#3
Nov2812, 05:49 AM

P: 15

when you say L(1)=1/s, it means that 1 in time domain is 1/s in Laplace domain.
Laplace domain is frequency domain of a function that already multiply with exponential decay. 



#4
Nov2812, 07:02 AM

P: 520

intuition about definition of laplace transform
Is it common to learn Laplace transformations without learning Fourier? We did not learn Fourier at all and my intuition is sketchy as well.




#5
Nov2812, 11:38 AM

P: 3,843

The "s" is a definition the transform of a function:
[tex]L(f(t))=f(s)=\int^{\infty}_0 e^{st} f(t)dt[/tex] There is no explanation on this, it is a definition. The use of it is to solve an equation that has integration and differentiation, into a simple algebraic equation. 



#6
Nov2812, 11:53 AM

P: 3,843

But again like in the other post, enroll in the ODE and PDE class, they teach you all these. I cannot emphasize how much I don't like math, but it's a necessary evil in engineering. Learn both of them. 



#7
Nov2812, 12:17 PM

P: 520

Funny, I actually *like* math (math major) but don't like Differential equations because it seems so "engineeringy." lol
In my DE class we learned Laplace but not Fourier  going onto series now. Dave K 



#8
Nov2812, 12:39 PM

P: 3,843





#9
Nov2812, 01:05 PM

P: 134

Hello there
I have had the exact same thoughts as you, and I believe I have found out how you can learn more, but  I must warn you  it is not an easy way. The best way to do it is to learn about Linear Transformations in Linear Algebra. Linear Algebra and differential equations can be coupled together quite nicely. The thing is that we want reversible Linear Transformations where the "information" is not lost when we do the transformation. It has to do with change of basis and eigenvalues. Using these concepts its possible to get a quite intuitive idea of the laplace transform. Fourier Transform is a simple case of decomposition, while the Laplace transform is not like that. It has a more analytical idea, that stems from the concept of a Linear Transformation. So if you're willing. Learn Linear Algebra and then dig into Linear Transformations. Learn about how to couple Linear Algebra and differential equations, and then the Laplace transformation will be a linear transformation of a "vector" that describes the differential equation. 



#11
Nov2812, 02:26 PM

P: 3,843





#12
Nov2912, 08:39 AM

P: 6

hi to all i don't need math definitions.what i need is physical understanding/interpretations of what laplace transform actually is ? and how does it work every text book gives me definitions (for those how have posted me regular definitions) @runei please tell me more about what u discussed above i mean how should i start etc etc and are their any other ways also if there please mention?




#13
Nov2912, 10:37 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,139

I have hoped for years to find a physical explanation or analogy for Laplace.
To me the Laplace transform is a tool that turns complex equations into simple ones. One needn't understand impulse and momentum and fracture mechanics to use a hammer.. but he can become adept at its use through repetition. Perhaps someday that AHA! moment will come. I can only envy those who do understand. I accept my limitations, and appreciate those who share their deeper understanding. old jim 



#14
Nov2912, 10:44 AM

P: 520

Perhaps this is a case of.. "Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them..." (John Von Neumann)




#15
Nov2912, 11:15 AM

P: 3,843

A(f(t))= f(t)+1 It is absolutely useless, BUT it's a transform!!!! Difference is my transform don't worry anything and Laplace transform works!!! Their might not be any rhyme and reason at all. There are a lot of things like this in science and math. The higher level you go, the more you encounter, try Fourier transform, Bessel, Legendre, try to make sense where it came from. It a big miss conception that science comes from theory, then proved by observation. A lot of them started from observation, then make up the theory and math. Some by intuition. Do you know how they discover the benzene ring in chemistry? The guy had a dream of a snake biting it's own tail and it goes around and around!!! Then he went on and proved that was true!!!! That's part of the reason I quit chemistry after I got the degree, I thought everything has a reason and from theory to practice...........I was wrong and I want to have nothing to do with it. You are in the wrong section here, go to "Differential Equation" in the math section here and ask. This is math. 



#16
Nov2912, 12:41 PM

P: 134

I can try and tell you how I got my kind of intuition first.
I can also recommend the following websites where they talk about it: 1. http://www.quora.com/Intuitivelyspe...tionrepresent (the first answer is a guy explaining exactly what I am talking about, but if you havent learned Linear Algebra, it is hard to understand) 2. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28...raltransforms (look at the answer from John D. Cook  answer number 3 i believe. He gives a possible geometric interpretation) 3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ2qulI6GEk (his introduction has another good interpretation) The thing is  There can be MANY interpretations of the transforms. But learning alot of them will give you more and more of the puzzle. At some point. You will get it. 



#17
Nov2912, 02:46 PM

P: 315

l7,
Why is the Laplace transformed? So one could manipulate and solve differential equations by algebraic means without calculus. Ratch P.S. In English, sentence beginnings are capitalized. It makes them easier to read that way. 



#18
Nov2912, 03:25 PM

Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 6,348

Instead of getting tied in knots about how the transform works, it might be better to learn what the splane represents  for example what the locations of poles and zeros mean for the dynamic behaviour of a system.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
IVP Laplace Transform Problem  Tricky Inverse Laplace Transform  Calculus & Beyond Homework  5  
How to connect the winding number's definition to geometrical intuition?  Calculus  6  
Laplace Transform Definition  General Math  4  
Finding an inverse Laplace Transform for a function  solving IVPs with Laplace  Calculus & Beyond Homework  2  
[help] A laplace transform definition problem  General Math  1 