| New Reply |
chemistry in the past |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec3-12, 05:26 PM | #1 |
|
|
chemistry in the past
Hello, how did chemists of the past know the weight of the elements to build up the periodic table without using new lab tecniques ?
Have they transformed all the elements in to gases and used Avogadro's law to obtain a relative atomic mass ? And how did they it was an element and not a compost ? Thank you |
| Dec3-12, 05:38 PM | #2 |
|
Admin
|
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.
Some composite substances were considered elements till they were proved to be not. |
| Dec4-12, 07:42 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Dec4-12, 08:05 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
chemistry in the past
What exactly do you mean with "whithout using new lab techniques"?
|
| Dec4-12, 03:17 PM | #5 |
|
|
withou the possibility to calculate the number of particles in a mole
|
| Dec4-12, 03:46 PM | #6 |
|
Admin
|
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
|
| Dec4-12, 04:34 PM | #7 |
|
|
If I take 1 g of Fe and 1g of S I can't calculate relative atomic weight because they don't contains the same quantity of atoms... |
| Dec4-12, 05:28 PM | #8 |
|
Admin
|
If you check how much Fe reacts with 1 g S you know ratio of their equivalent weights. This ratio is not some random number, but depends on the molar masses and valency of elements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalent_(chemistry) |
| Dec4-12, 05:53 PM | #9 |
|
|
Dalton was the first to propose and publish a system of atomic weights.
Google "Dalton atomic weights" finds lots. However he was right about some and wrong about other weights, as were those who followed immediately. The story of how the correct values gradually unfolded is quite fascinating and well presented in the book "Chasing the Molecule" by Julian Buckingham |
| Dec5-12, 01:56 AM | #10 |
|
Recognitions:
|
You don't need to have vapours. You can also infer the ammount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
As others pointed out before, a lot can be learned from studying the mass proportions in different compounds. |
| Dec5-12, 09:21 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
| Dec5-12, 09:31 AM | #12 |
|
Admin
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: chemistry in the past
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Will a PhD in Theoretical Chemistry restrict my future post-doc to chemistry? | Academic Guidance | 1 | ||
| Chemistry - Trying to name aromatic compounds and organic chemistry molecules | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 1 | ||
| Chemistry in the Real World - Super Quick Question on chemistry/pools | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 1 | ||