chemistry in the past


by scientifico
Tags: chemistry
scientifico
scientifico is offline
#1
Dec3-12, 05:26 PM
P: 180
Hello, how did chemists of the past know the weight of the elements to build up the periodic table without using new lab tecniques ?
Have they transformed all the elements in to gases and used Avogadro's law to obtain a relative atomic mass ? And how did they it was an element and not a compost ?

Thank you
Phys.Org News Partner Chemistry news on Phys.org
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
New, more versatile version of Geckskin: Gecko-like adhesives now useful for real world surfaces
Researcher develops novel wastewater treatment fabric
Borek
Borek is offline
#2
Dec3-12, 05:38 PM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,671
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.

Some composite substances were considered elements till they were proved to be not.
scientifico
scientifico is offline
#3
Dec4-12, 07:42 AM
P: 180
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.
Yes but to compare atomic weight of two elements you must be sure you have the same number of particles in both elements, how did they solved this ?

DrDu
DrDu is offline
#4
Dec4-12, 08:05 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,368

chemistry in the past


What exactly do you mean with "whithout using new lab techniques"?
scientifico
scientifico is offline
#5
Dec4-12, 03:17 PM
P: 180
withou the possibility to calculate the number of particles in a mole
Borek
Borek is offline
#6
Dec4-12, 03:46 PM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,671
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
scientifico
scientifico is offline
#7
Dec4-12, 04:34 PM
P: 180
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
What do you mean?
If I take 1 g of Fe and 1g of S I can't calculate relative atomic weight because they don't contains the same quantity of atoms...
Borek
Borek is offline
#8
Dec4-12, 05:28 PM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,671
If you check how much Fe reacts with 1 g S you know ratio of their equivalent weights. This ratio is not some random number, but depends on the molar masses and valency of elements.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalent_(chemistry)
Studiot
Studiot is offline
#9
Dec4-12, 05:53 PM
P: 5,462
Dalton was the first to propose and publish a system of atomic weights.

Google "Dalton atomic weights" finds lots.

However he was right about some and wrong about other weights, as were those who followed immediately.

The story of how the correct values gradually unfolded is quite fascinating and well presented in the book

"Chasing the Molecule" by Julian Buckingham
DrDu
DrDu is offline
#10
Dec5-12, 01:56 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,368
You don't need to have vapours. You can also infer the ammount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
As others pointed out before, a lot can be learned from studying the mass proportions in different compounds.
scientifico
scientifico is offline
#11
Dec5-12, 09:21 AM
P: 180
Quote Quote by DrDu View Post
You can also infer the ammount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
What are that ?
Borek
Borek is offline
#12
Dec5-12, 09:31 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,671
Quote Quote by scientifico View Post
What are that ?
Have you tried to google them or do you expect to be spoon feed all the time?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Will a PhD in Theoretical Chemistry restrict my future post-doc to chemistry? Academic Guidance 1
Chemistry - Trying to name aromatic compounds and organic chemistry molecules Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Chemistry in the Real World - Super Quick Question on chemistry/pools Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1