on Bessel function's orthogonality


by samuelandjw
Tags: bessel, function, orthogonality
samuelandjw
samuelandjw is offline
#1
Dec13-12, 10:16 PM
P: 23
Use the orthogonality relation of Bessel function to argue whether the following two integrals are zero or not:
[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(x)xJ_2(x)dx[/itex]
[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(k_1x)J_1(k_2x)dx[/itex], where [tex]k_1,k_2[/tex] are two distinct zeros of Bessel function of order 1.

The textbook we are using is Boas's Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, so the formulas that are available to us are a set of recursion relations of Bessel function, and the orthogonality relations between Bessel function of the same order: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/d...024cce03fd.png.

For the first integral, the two Bessel functions are of different order, and there is no zeros in the arguments of the two functions, so I have no idea how to link the first integral to the orthogonality relation of Bessel functions.

For the second integral, my argument is that since [itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(k_1x)xJ_1(k_2x)dx[/itex] is zero, the 2nd integral (note that there is no x between the two Bessel function) cannot be zero. I think this argument is quite weak. Would anyone give me a better argument?

Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
lurflurf
lurflurf is offline
#2
Dec13-12, 11:25 PM
HW Helper
P: 2,150
The first one integral(positive function)=positive number
samuelandjw
samuelandjw is offline
#3
Dec13-12, 11:41 PM
P: 23
Quote Quote by lurflurf View Post
The first one integral(positive function)=positive number
Thanks for your reply. We can surely say that [tex]J_1(x),J_2(x)[/tex] are positive functions between x=0 and x=1 because the first nontrivial zeros are larger than 1. One has to somehow use the information of the location of zeros to reach this conclusion. Suppose we don't have this information, is it still possible to argue that the integral is non-zero?

vijay0
vijay0 is offline
#4
Dec14-12, 12:27 AM
P: 2

on Bessel function's orthogonality


See if this will help: http://math.stackexchange.com/questi...ssel-functions
samuelandjw
samuelandjw is offline
#5
Dec15-12, 01:33 AM
P: 23
Quote Quote by vijay0 View Post
Thanks for your reply. That post does not seem very useful though.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Using Bessel generating function to derive a integral representation of Bessel functi Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Orthogonality limits of Bessel Polynomials Calculus 1
Bessel Function, Orthogonality and More Differential Equations 3
Orthogonality of Bessel Functions Differential Equations 0
Orthogonality of Spherical Bessel Functions General Math 0