## Low-pass filter with unideal op-amp

Looking at this attachment I see it says the load is 100 k-ohm..I have been looking at the proper one when doing the calculations tho they are the same. I see how you got the DC gain but I don't get how you get it at 100 Hz, it looks like they are at the same height..

The frequency range is from 10 Hz to 1 Mhz and the response does not need to be that precise, I am interested in how the frequency response given in the datasheet will affect the frequency response of my filter.
 Recognitions: Homework Help At 100Hz the gain is < 10⁴, placing it more than 20dB down. It seems (based on my brief reading) that the BIAS MODE is largely directed towards reducing the differential offset towards the ideal. This hardly seems important to most filter apps, so I think you'd be choosing the bias that maximizes gain around 1MHz. Low bias will stretch GB to 1.7MHz
 Recognitions: Homework Help Here's some semilog graph paper showing how the logarithmic cycle is divided into 10 equal steps. http://www.science-projects.com/SemiLog0.GIF Revising my estimates: gain is about 3x10⁵ at 1Hz, and 7x10⁴ at 100Hz. The GB product changes to some extent with supply voltage VDD and BIAS. The graph you provide is for VDD =5V. So that's the supply voltage you will be using? (See Fig 27 of the datasheet I referred to.)
 Yeah that is the supply voltage I am using, I understand how to read log scale, I was looking at a different graph then the one I post (sorry). Even if I change the bias mode I still have no idea how to look at the graph provided in the datasheet and modify the ideal response I plotted in matlab. That's all I want to know.
 Excuse me in making a comment that is not related to the question here. As I practice design engineer, this is not a LPF I would design. 1) If I want a 1st order LPF with gain of 1 only, I use a simple RC, not with opamp. 2) You are having pole frequency of something like 10KHz from the graph, at frequency where the opamp unity GBWP of below 1MHz, you are only -30dB down. You are going to see the effect of the opamp. 3)If you really want to do this, I question the opamp choice. Look at the bode plot, the second pole of the opamp kicks in before unity gain, you have extra phase shift that likely cause a peak close to cross over. The situation might be made worst because you are working in the gain of << 1 because you only start at gain of 1!!!! At least find an opamp that has higher GBWP that absolutely have a single pole cross over. I know this is a practice circuit, but you still want to think about real world design. Look at a simple second order active filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallen%...93Key_topology In the diagram, C2 is at the input of the opamp, this will roll off the high frequency before even going into the opamp. This will mitigates the peaking effect for the opamp and produce better result. I am not saying this won't work, I did not do simulation, but there is potential problem just by looking at the circuit.

Recognitions:
Homework Help
 Quote by xortan Even if I change the bias mode I still have no idea how to look at the graph provided in the datasheet and modify the ideal response I plotted in matlab. That's all I want to know.
Are you giving matlab the circuit, or the transfer function? (I don't know matlab.)

If you want to simulate the circuit, in place of the ideal differential amplifier use that ideal differential amplifier followed by a low-pass filter (R and C) followed by an ideal non-inverting buffer amplifier (perhaps having an output impedance). Then around that as your amplifier, you arrange your filter's passive components.

 Quote by NascentOxygen Are you giving matlab the circuit, or the transfer function? (I don't know matlab.) If you want to simulate the circuit, in place of the ideal differential amplifier use that ideal differential amplifier followed by a low-pass filter (R and C) followed by an ideal non-inverting buffer amplifier (perhaps having an output impedance). Then around that as your amplifier, you arrange your filter's passive components.
Matlab deals with transfer functions. It has no schematic capture.

A better tool for exploring circuits is LTspice, and it's free! http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/#LTspice
 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads for: Low-pass filter with unideal op-amp Thread Forum Replies Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 6 Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0 Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0 Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1