 Quote by Artusartos
I have two questions:
1) For the example on the second page, I don't understand why they say [tex]\alpha\gamma\alpha^{-1} = (\alpha1 \alpha3)(\alpha2 \alpha4 \alpha7)(\alpha5)(\alpha6)[/tex] instead of [tex]\alpha\gamma\alpha^{-1} = (\alpha1\alpha^{-1} \alpha3\alpha^{-1})(\alpha2\alpha^{-1} \alpha4\alpha^{-1} \alpha7\alpha^{-1})(\alpha5\alpha^{-1})(\alpha6\alpha^{-1})[/tex].
|
They say what is consistent with what the theorem says. The theorem says to "apply [itex] \alpha [/itex]" to the symbols in the cycles.
If [itex] \alpha,\ p,\ q [/itex] are cycles, It is true that [itex] \alpha (\ p \ q) \ \alpha^{-1} =( \alpha \ p \ \alpha^{-1})(\alpha \ q \ \alpha^{-1}) [/itex] but this is not the content of the theorem. A cycle is not the same as the product of the individual symbols in the cycle. The cycle (1,2,3) is not equal to (1)(2)(3).
|
2) For the tables at the top of the 2nd page, I don't know how they computed those numbers...
|
For example, In the permutation group [itex] S_4 [/itex], there are 8 different elements of the group that are cycles of length 3. The example (1,2,3) in the table illustrates one of them.
(There are 24 = (4)(3)(2) different permutations that can be formed by taking 3 distinct numbers from the set of numbers {1,2,3,4}. However, each permutation such as (1,2,3) is one of 3 representations of the same cycle. (1,2,3) = (2,3,1) = (3,1,2) So there are 8 = 24/3 distinct cycles of length 3 )