Fuzzy logic control vs PID?

by I_am_learning
Tags: control, fuzzy, logic
 P: 664 I am trying to begin with fuzzy logic, but this initial question is preventing me from moving any forward. It appears that fuzzy logic control is just an improvement over bang-bang control system. Like instead of doing bang-up , bang-down it does bang-up-hard, bang-up-small bang-down-small etc. It just appears to be discretized proportional control. If it is all about it, we have even better PID control, so why use fuzzy? Obviously I am missing something. Please help.
 PF Patron P: 1,261 What your missing is the needed process model. In siuations where close is good enough the bang up bang down method is fine. One example is tank filling. However there are numerous situations that require tighter control. Some will accept a quartlery amplitude decay. Some need even further dampening to being critically dampened. The key is the needs of the process.
 Sci Advisor P: 5,430 Most "simple" control theory (e.g. PID system design) assumes the behaviour of the system is lnear and its transfer functions are known. Fuzzy logic system design doesn't require either of those two assumptions.
P: 664

Fuzzy logic control vs PID?

In fuzzy logic control of temperature, you don't say temp is cold, instead you say temp is .83cold, so instead of doing heater on you do heater .83on.
I still find it fundamentally very similar to proportional control.
Can someone show me fundamental difference?
 PF Patron P: 1,261 Rather than go into th extensive pros and cons of each this article has a well described comparison between the two. In many ways either can be used. http://www.ece.uidaho.edu/ee/classes...%20Control.pdf one thing to note that this article does not discuss ifs the Kreiger Nickoles math usually give a quarterly amplitude decay. thats 4 overshoots each overshoot less each time before it stabilizes on a setpoint. The math gets you close but not critically dampened. critically dampened is no overshoot a smooth transition to set point.
P: 664
 Quote by Mordred Rather than go into th extensive pros and cons of each this article has a well described comparison between the two. In many ways either can be used. http://www.ece.uidaho.edu/ee/classes...%20Control.pdf one thing to note that this article does not discuss ifs the Kreiger Nickoles math usually give a quarterly amplitude decay. thats 4 overshoots each overshoot less each time before it stabilizes on a setpoint. The math gets you close but not critically dampened. critically dampened is no overshoot a smooth transition to set point.
Thanks.
The article looks just like what I was looking for.
I will read it thoroughly and come with more questions if required.

 Related Discussions Quantum Physics 2 Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 15 General Discussion 10 General Discussion 84