
#1
Jan2813, 10:31 PM

P: 669

I am trying to begin with fuzzy logic, but this initial question is preventing me from moving any forward.
It appears that fuzzy logic control is just an improvement over bangbang control system. Like instead of doing bangup , bangdown it does banguphard, bangupsmall bangdownsmall etc. It just appears to be discretized proportional control. If it is all about it, we have even better PID control, so why use fuzzy? Obviously I am missing something. Please help. 



#2
Jan2813, 10:50 PM

PF Gold
P: 1,528

What your missing is the needed process model. In siuations where close is good enough the bang up bang down method is fine. One example is tank filling.
However there are numerous situations that require tighter control. Some will accept a quartlery amplitude decay. Some need even further dampening to being critically dampened. The key is the needs of the process. 



#3
Jan2913, 09:56 AM

Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 6,356

Most "simple" control theory (e.g. PID system design) assumes the behaviour of the system is lnear and its transfer functions are known.
Fuzzy logic system design doesn't require either of those two assumptions. 



#4
Jan2913, 10:12 AM

P: 669

Fuzzy logic control vs PID?
In fuzzy logic control of temperature, you don't say temp is cold, instead you say temp is .83cold, so instead of doing heater on you do heater .83on.
I still find it fundamentally very similar to proportional control. Can someone show me fundamental difference? 



#5
Jan2913, 05:11 PM

PF Gold
P: 1,528

Rather than go into th extensive pros and cons of each this article has a well described comparison between the two. In many ways either can be used.
http://www.ece.uidaho.edu/ee/classes...%20Control.pdf one thing to note that this article does not discuss ifs the Kreiger Nickoles math usually give a quarterly amplitude decay. thats 4 overshoots each overshoot less each time before it stabilizes on a setpoint. The math gets you close but not critically dampened. critically dampened is no overshoot a smooth transition to set point. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
is 'Fuzzy' logic an appropiate Quantum logic ??  Quantum Physics  2  
what is fuzzy logic?  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  15  
Fuzzy Logic  General Discussion  10  
Fuzzy Logic  General Discussion  84 