New Reply

Circuits - Variables dependent on R?

 
Share Thread
Feb5-13, 02:35 PM   #1
 

Circuits - Variables dependent on R?


The circuit of interest is attached.
The question is to solve for I1, I2, I3, I4, and V_diode.

My question is will the variables come out to be numbers or dependent on R?


This is how I did it and it depends on R:
I3=0 b/c of the open.
The branch with the open is pretty much not there.
Thus,
KCL: I1+I2=I4
KVL gives 2 equations:
1-2R*I1+R*I2=0
-R*I2-R*I4+1=0

So I guess I1, I2, I4, and V_diode will not solve to be numbers and will depend on R? Or did I do this all wrong?
Attached Thumbnails
Untitled.png  
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Feb5-13, 03:06 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
How is the diode hooked up? Cathode to + or the other way?
Feb5-13, 03:16 PM   #3
 
Quote by rude man View Post
How is the diode hooked up? Cathode to + or the other way?
The diode is hooked up so with the way I_3 is drawn, it would cause the 'ideal' diode to become an open. I'm not sure how to describe that in terms of the cathode.
Feb5-13, 04:46 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Circuits - Variables dependent on R?


Quote by pyroknife View Post
The diode is hooked up so with the way I_3 is drawn, it would cause the 'ideal' diode to become an open. I'm not sure how to describe that in terms of the cathode.
So i3 can only be zero or negative?
Feb5-13, 06:08 PM   #5
 
Quote by rude man View Post
So i3 can only be zero or negative?
I_3 is 0 because that branch of the circuit technically doesn't exist.
Feb5-13, 06:24 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by pyroknife View Post
I_3 is 0 because that branch of the circuit technically doesn't exist.
Then why does the question ask for I3? Are you sure you have stated the question accurately?
Feb5-13, 06:40 PM   #7
 
I don't see why it can't ask for I3.
I_3 is simply 0. That's the answer for I3, only 1 of the 5 variables to be solved.
I still need to solve for I1, I2, I4, v_diode.
Feb5-13, 07:29 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
OK, so the first thing is to simplify the circuit by removing irrelevant components.
Feb5-13, 07:31 PM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Do you know the superposition theorem?
Feb5-13, 08:09 PM   #10
 
Quote by rude man View Post
Do you know the superposition theorem?
Yes, but everything in class and tests will be done from using KVL and KCL. So those are the things I would prefer to use.

Wouldn't superposition give me the same answer as my original post?


I attached a new drawing with the resistor removed. I kept the V_diode in there though.
Attached Thumbnails
Untitled.png  
Feb5-13, 08:35 PM   #11
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Good first step. Now, looking at the original schematic, can you identify one of your new nodes with Vdiode(-)? Let us call the node Vdiode(+) = zero volts, shall we.
Feb5-13, 09:19 PM   #12
 
Quote by rude man View Post
Good first step. Now, looking at the original schematic, can you identify one of your new nodes with Vdiode(-)? Let us call the node Vdiode(+) = zero volts, shall we.

The node would be the wire between the 3 resistors.

But I still think you answer will not solve to be a number and will still depend on R.
Feb5-13, 10:41 PM   #13
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by pyroknife View Post
The node would be the wire between the 3 resistors.

But I still think you answer will not solve to be a number and will still depend on R.
You are correct on both counts. How could the answer not depend on R?
Feb5-13, 10:48 PM   #14
 
Quote by rude man View Post
You are correct on both counts. How could the answer not depend on R?
What I mean by that is if I1, I2, I4, and Vdiode will come out as actual numbers (i.e R ends up canceling out somewhere in the equation and you're left with actual numbers) or if it will come out as involving the variable 'R.'

i.e Vdiode maybe something like Vdiode=2R instead of something like 10V
Feb6-13, 04:21 AM   #15
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
The equations for the currents will all involve variable R.
Feb6-13, 10:15 AM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by pyroknife View Post
What I mean by that is if I1, I2, I4, and Vdiode will come out as actual numbers (i.e R ends up canceling out somewhere in the equation and you're left with actual numbers) or if it will come out as involving the variable 'R.'

i.e Vdiode maybe something like Vdiode=2R instead of something like 10V
Not possible. You can't get around I = V/R. V is a number so I must involve R.

What level are you at in your studies?
Feb6-13, 09:23 PM   #17
 
3rd year undergrad. Why?
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Circuits - Variables dependent on R?
Thread Forum Replies
Circuits-dependent source Introductory Physics Homework 8
Thevenin Equivalent Circuits with Dependent Source General Physics 3
PDE in two dependent variables Differential Equations 2
Independent and Dependent Variables Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Thevenin Equivalent for circuits with dependent sources Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 2