Register to reply

The continuity of f

by macca1994
Tags: continuity
Share this thread:
macca1994
#1
Feb6-13, 03:02 PM
P: 19
I have seen this theorem in a few books, but none of them give proofs, it says

if f(x) is a continuous function then lf(x)l is a continuous function. What is the proof of this because i don't really understand why this holds, thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
micromass
#2
Feb6-13, 03:05 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,086
The function [itex]|~|:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous. Composition of continuous functions is continuous.
jedishrfu
#3
Feb6-13, 03:08 PM
P: 2,812
It makes sense though.

Consider y=-1/x : its continuous in the domain of x in (0,infinity) right?

and its counterpart z=|-1/x| = 1/x is continuous in the same domain for x

macca1994
#4
Feb6-13, 03:10 PM
P: 19
The continuity of f

Ahh, yeah i get that, but can you not prove it without using composition of two functions?
jedishrfu
#5
Feb6-13, 03:14 PM
P: 2,812
You could probably prove it via the Weierstrass definition:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_function

but Im not a mathematician so you'll have to hope HallsOfIvy checks this thread.
macca1994
#6
Feb6-13, 03:17 PM
P: 19
i might pm him, cheers
micromass
#7
Feb6-13, 03:20 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,086
It is very easy to prove using the [itex]\epsilon-\delta[/itex] definition. Are you familiar with [itex]\epsilon[/itex]and [itex]\delta[/itex] definitions?
macca1994
#8
Feb6-13, 03:21 PM
P: 19
yeah, that's about the limit of my analysis knowledge, how would you use the ε,δ definition?
jedishrfu
#9
Feb6-13, 03:22 PM
P: 2,812
Quote Quote by macca1994 View Post
i might pm him, cheers
No need micro can handle it too. I think the epsilon / delta is the weierstrass definition.
micromass
#10
Feb6-13, 03:28 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,086
Quote Quote by macca1994 View Post
yeah, that's about the limit of my analysis knowledge, how would you use the ε,δ definition?
Take an [itex]a\in \mathbb{R}[/itex]. You will need to prove

[tex]\forall \varepsilon >0: \exists \delta >0: \forall x: |x-a|<\delta~\Rightarrow ||f(x)|-|f(a)||<\varepsilon[/tex]

You are given that f is continuous in a, thus:

[tex]\forall \varepsilon >0: \exists \delta >0: \forall x: |x-a|<\delta~\Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<\varepsilon[/tex]

So, take [itex]\varepsilon>0[/itex] arbitrary. Take [itex]\delta>0[/itex] as in the previous definition: so it holds that

[tex]\forall x: |x-a|<\delta~\Rightarrow |f(x)-f(a)|<\varepsilon[/tex]

Take an x arbitrary such that [itex]|x-a|<\delta[/itex]. Then we know that

[tex]||f(x)|-|f(a)||\leq |f(x)-f(a)|<\varepsilon[/tex]

So we have verified that [itex]||f(x)|-|f(a)||<\varepsilon[/itex] and thus we have verified that [itex]\varepsilon-\delta[/itex] definition of continuity. Thus [itex]|f|[/itex] is continuous.
macca1994
#11
Feb6-13, 03:33 PM
P: 19
ah that makes sense and is very obvious, do you need to show that limit of lf(x)l is in fact lf(a)l or is that just obvious?
micromass
#12
Feb6-13, 04:12 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,086
Quote Quote by macca1994 View Post
ah that makes sense and is very obvious, do you need to show that limit of lf(x)l is in fact lf(a)l or is that just obvious?
I've just proven that here. It's because |f| is continuous in a.
macca1994
#13
Feb6-13, 04:36 PM
P: 19
oh okay, i get it, thanks for the help
joeblow
#14
Feb8-13, 08:11 AM
P: 71
Are you trying to prove this for a class or so that you understand it? Judging from your posts, I don't think that you understand the epsilon-delta statements.

Many calculus teachers give the intuitive rule "if you can completely draw the graph of f on an interval without lifting your pencil, then f is continuous on that interval." This is true, and it will work if you are given an f for which the antecedent is true. (In your case, you're not given a particular f, so this rule would not lead to a proof, even on an informal level.)

However, mathematicians do not care about continuous functions because they appear to be connected; they study continuous functions because continuous functions enjoy the property that small changes in input do not significantly affect their outputs. That is, if we want our function outputs to be within some margin of error ε about the function value f(y), we can always bound an interval of radius δ about y so that if we choose any input in the interval (y-δ,y+δ), we are guaranteed to have an output within the interval (f(y)-ε,f(y)+ε). Any function that enjoys this property is continuous at y.

Sorry if I'm telling you something you already know, but I have had far too many students who still equate continuity with connectivity because teachers of the calculus never tell the students the true importance of continuous functions. I thought I'd better intervene before you settled on what continuity means in your mind.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Condition for local absolute continuity to imply uniform continuity Calculus 0
Cauchy sequences and continuity versus uniform continuity Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Real Analysis: Continuity and Uniform Continuity Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Continuity on Restrictions Implies Continuity Everywhere Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Continuity & Uniform Continuity Calculus 6