
#1
Feb1213, 10:04 AM

P: 877

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I am working on a problem that is similar to this one: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=598914 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution When r < a, why doesn't the electric fields generated by the concentric conducting, hollow sphere affect the Gaussian surface at that point?? Why is the electric field at a point in the concentric conducting, hollow sphere zero? After all, it doesn't specify that it is in electrostatic equilibrium. Also, what is the difference between the entire system being in electrostatic equilibrium and just the concentric conducting, hollow sphere being in electrostatic equilibrium? Can an insulator be in electrostatic equilibrium? 



#2
Feb1213, 04:54 PM

HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 4,417





#3
Feb1313, 07:14 AM

P: 877

So, you are saying that if I was to generate a Gaussian surface inside of the conductor (say, a sphere), then the flux through this surface is zero, because the electric field through this surface is zero? How can this be? I know that the charge isn't distributed inside of the conductor, the charge resides on the surface, but the Gaussian surface would still enclose the insulator, which has a charge.
EDIT: Something just came to my mind: does the insulator induce the electrostatic equilibrium? And if the insulator had a positive charge, it would cause the electrons in the conductor to move to the surface closest to the insulator? Leaving the other surface "less" negative? 



#4
Feb1313, 07:41 AM

Mentor
P: 40,890

Applying Gauss's Law Several Times 



#5
Feb1313, 08:00 AM

P: 877

So, using the diagram given in the link, if I was to place a Gaussian sphere directly between the insulator and conductor, the electric field lines emanating from the insulator will "hit" the sphere from the inside, and the electric field lines emanating from the conductor "strike" the very surface of the Gaussian sphere; and so, the electric fields combine to cancel out?
And is this the reason why we don't have to consider the electric field of the conductor when generating a Gaussian surface that meets the condition of r < a, because the electric fields lines never even make it that far? EDIT: Also, is there a way of quantifying the amount of induction that the insulator affects? Would it just be equal and opposite to the charge of the insulator? And the remaining charge would reside on the outside? 



#6
Feb1313, 09:31 AM

P: 877

For example, say the insulator has a charge of Q1 = 3.60 C, and the conductor had a total charge of 2.00 C. Would the inner surface of the conductor would have a charge of Q2 = Q1 > Q2 = 3.60 C; and would this then imply that Q3, the outer surface of the conductor, would have a charge of Q2 + Q3 = 2.00 C > Q3 = 1.6 C?




#8
Feb1313, 09:59 AM

P: 877

Why is it correct, if you don't mind me asking?




#9
Feb1313, 01:18 PM

P: 877

Is there some law or principle of induction?




#10
Feb1313, 01:55 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 7,404





#11
Feb1313, 02:02 PM

P: 877

So, would electric field at a radius of a < r < b be zero?
EDIT: And would it be zero because the number of electric field lines radiating out of the Gaussian surface equals the number of electric field lines coming in? 



#12
Feb1313, 02:16 PM

HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 4,417





#13
Feb1313, 02:19 PM

Mentor
P: 40,890





#14
Feb1313, 02:19 PM

P: 877

So, the flux through a Gaussian only depends on the charge enclosed, further implying that it only depends on the electric field emanating from that enclosed charge?




#15
Feb1313, 02:19 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 7,404

E field lines originate from Positive and terminate on Negative charge. The negative charge on the inner surface of the conductor does not interfere with the electric field at a < r < b . So the field at a radius of a < r < b is not zero. Gauss's Law says the flux though a sphere of such radius is not zero. 



#16
Feb1313, 02:20 PM

P: 877





#17
Feb1313, 02:34 PM

Mentor
P: 40,890




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
If you flip a coin 100 times how many times will it land on heads?  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  18  
what is the gravity of a planet 2 times the radius and 3 times the mass of earth  Introductory Physics Homework  6  
angular momentum powering operator L[]  applying n times  Advanced Physics Homework  1  
Applying force vs applying weight to an atwood machine  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
Applying gauss' law to planar symmetry, finding E question  Introductory Physics Homework  2 