Help! Electric Field in Sphere with Uniform Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field in various regions surrounding a solid insulating sphere with uniform charge density and a concentric uncharged conducting hollow sphere. For the region inside the insulating sphere (r < a), the electric field is derived using Gauss's law, leading to the conclusion that E = (Qr)/(4πε0a^3). The participants clarify that the charge density affects the electric field differently in conductors and insulators, emphasizing that an insulator can maintain a uniform charge density while a conductor cannot. The conversation also touches on the process for determining induced charges on the surfaces of the hollow sphere, indicating a need for further exploration of that topic. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying Gauss's law in different contexts of charge distribution.
Color_of_Cyan
Messages
386
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid, insulating sphere of radius a has a uniform charge density of ρ and a total charge of Q. Concentric with this sphere is an uncharged, conducting hollow sphere whose inner and outer radii are b and c, as shown.

p24-57.gif
A). Find the magnitude of the electric field in the following regions:

r < a (Use the following as necessary: ρ, ε0, and r.)

a < r < b

b < r < c

r > cB). Determine the induced charge per unit area on the inner and outer surfaces of the hollow sphere.

Homework Equations


Gauss's law for electric field (?):

E∫dA = (q in) / (ε0)

E = ke q / r2

E = 0 inside a CONDUCTOR

q = σdA (surface area?)

q = ρdV (volume? )

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just concerned about the first part r< a and hopefully I will understand the restThis is just really tough for me... so many things I need to look out for and it is really confusing.

It is confusing when thinking about dimensions as the uniform charge is concerned with volume ( q = ρdV) yet I thought Gauss's Law ( flux = E ∫ dA ) was just concerned with 2D surface area only. Or am I missing something? Also I am not sure how the inner sphere, being an insulator, has any affect on the electric field.So...

for r < a, the electric field is not 0 and so

E ∫ dA = q in / ε0

E (4πr2) = q in / ε0

E = q in / (4πr2ε0)


which turns out wrong for r < a. It is still wrong even when I substitute q in as pV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Let me try

I think you were doing fine but substituted the wrong charge:

Q=ρV=ρ((4/3)πa3) therefor ρ=Q/((4/3)πa3)
for the new volume inside the sphere then q=ρ/((4/3)πr3)
if you substitute those to what you found then you get E = q in / (4πr2ε0) = ρ((4/3)πr3)/(4πr2ε0)
this equals ρr/3ε0 and if you substitute for ρ then Q/((4/3)πa3)r/3ε0 = Qr/(4/3)πa30 which equals Qr/4πε0a3
 
Last edited:


Also I am not sure how the inner sphere, being an insulator, has any affect on the electric field.

If, for example, the inner sphere was a conductor, it would be impossible to have a uniform charge density (as then the electric field inside the sphere would not be zero). This is the only reason they're stressing that it is an insulator
 


I got all the answers to it now, thanks for your help.

How would I go about finding the induced charges now? How would I start?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top