| New Reply |
Notation confusion; |\pi N; I, I_3> states |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb17-13, 08:04 AM | #1 |
|
|
Notation confusion; |\pi N; I, I_3> states
In my book it says for the ##\pi N ## state:
##|\pi N; \frac{3}{2},\frac{3}{2}\rangle =|\pi ;1,1\rangle | N; \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle## firstly, does this mean: ##|\pi N; \frac{3}{2},\frac{3}{2}\rangle =|\pi ;1,1\rangle \otimes | N; \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle## ? Not that it really matters, but next it says that you can use quantum mechanical shift ladder to get ##|\pi N; \frac{3}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle =-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}|\pi ^+n\rangle +\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}| \pi ^0 p\rangle## I'm really not too sure what this means, and the notation is not too clear to me, could someone explain it to me? In the title I and I_3 refers to isospin. I don't know what the N indicates, Baryon number? Is the tensor product a key to get the coefficients, are they similar to Clebsch-Gordon coefficients or what is the ladder operation for spin in terms of these vectors? I really don't have much understanding of the notation or implications at the moment. |
| Feb17-13, 09:14 AM | #2 |
|
|
The N stands for Nucleon. The nucleon states with I=1/2 are proton (I3= +1/2) and neutron (I3 = -1/2). So the first line says the combined state with I = 3/2, I3 = 3/2 consists of π+ and proton.
To get the last line, we apply the operator I- that lowers total I3. It acts on both the pion and the proton. Lowering the proton to a neutron gives us the first term, while lowering the π+ to a π0 gives us the second term. As you say, the √'s in front of these terms are Clebsch-GordAn coefficients. |
| Feb17-13, 09:56 AM | #3 |
|
|
OK, so would a way to look at that operation be: ##I_- |\pi N; \frac{3}{2},\frac{3}{2}\rangle = I_- |\pi ;1,1\rangle \otimes | N; \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle + |\pi ;1,1\rangle \otimes I_-| N; \frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle## ? Which will give me ## k_1 |\pi^0 p \rangle + k_2 | \pi^+ n\rangle ## ? where the coefficients are CG coefficients? |
| Feb17-13, 02:07 PM | #4 |
|
|
Notation confusion; |\pi N; I, I_3> states
Yep, that's correct.
|
| Feb18-13, 11:51 AM | #5 |
|
|
Thanks for the help
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Notation confusion; |\pi N; I, I_3> states
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Confusion created by notation in E&M | Classical Physics | 3 | ||
| Transformer notation confusion? | Introductory Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| Notation Confusion | Chemistry | 4 | ||
| Density of States Confusion | Advanced Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| States of an atom in spectral notation | Advanced Physics Homework | 4 | ||