Calculate Orbital Period of Earth: GM & a for t in Years

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the orbital period of Earth using the formula \( t_{years} = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{GM}} \), where participants explore the implications of using different units, particularly focusing on the semi-major axis \( a \) and the gravitational constant \( G \). The scope includes mathematical reasoning, unit conversion, and conceptual understanding of orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over their calculated orbital period, suggesting they may have made errors in unit conversion.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of using consistent units, particularly converting astronomical units (AU) to meters for accurate calculations.
  • Some participants argue that the formula \( T(years) = \sqrt{a^3} \) is not physically acceptable without proper unit considerations.
  • There are discussions about the gravitational constant \( G \) and its units, with a focus on ensuring all quantities are in SI units.
  • A later reply mentions that the formula can be acceptable if using the correct units of years and AU, highlighting the importance of understanding context in physics problems.
  • One participant shares their final calculations after correcting their approach, indicating a learning process through the discussion.
  • Another participant advises using approximation signs when dealing with non-exact figures in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of unit consistency and dimensional analysis, but there is disagreement regarding the acceptability of the formula used without proper unit conversion. The discussion remains unresolved on whether the formula can be used as is in certain contexts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on definitions of units used in the calculations. Some participants reference external sources for clarification, indicating potential discrepancies in understanding the formula's application.

DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
Im having a little trouble finding the orbital period of Earth using:

[tex]t_{years}=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{GM}}[/tex]

"M" being the mass of the central body, obviously the sun, at 2 x 10^30 kg
"a" being the semi-major distance in Au = 1
So,
[tex]\approx[/tex]

[tex]t_{years}=6.28\sqrt{\frac{1}{6.673*2}}*\sqrt{\frac{1}{10^{-11}*10^{30}}[/tex]

[tex]t_{years}=6.28\sqrt{.0749}*\sqrt{10^{-19}}[/tex]

[tex]t_{years}=6.28*.2736*(3.16*10^{-10})[/tex]

[tex]t_{years}=5.428*10^{-10}[/tex]

[tex]5.428*10^{-10}\neq1year[/tex]

I know I'm doing something terribly wrong, any help appreciated :biggrin:

One other question, the gravitational constant is in Newton/seconds right?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1-st question:how did u get the orbit period in HOURS?
2-nd question:are u familiar working with big numbers?

Daniel.

PS.Use the constant correctly.Together with their units.
 
dextercioby said:
1-st question:how did u get the orbit period in HOURS?

Ya big oopps, I realize my sheet says years, I don't know why I remembered hours, ill edit that thank you.
dextercioby said:
2-nd question:are u familiar working with big numbers?
Familiar enough.
 
WHAT?It should be in SECONDS,because every other constant (in the RHS) is in SI units...

Daniel.

PS.Post your work.Again,pay attention with your units.
The result should be roughly [tex]\pi\cdot 10^{7} s[/tex].
 
You need to get all of quantities in the same units. Make it a habit to write the physical units of all of your quantities. What are your units of length? Are they the same in both the numerator and denominator?
 
When working with problems like these, you should be sure to convert to SI units. ie 1 Year = 3600 x 24 x 365 seconds.
If you are methodical in doing this everytime, you should avoid further problems.

And if required in the end result, you can convert back to years again without messing with your working.

Also AU is NOT the unit you want to be using for length. Convert to metres.

I think you need to take some classes on dimensional analysis...has anyone got any good links for that?
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I am confused though. I've been wroking it out over and over and keep getting weird answers, I really can't see what to change. Should "a" be in metres because G is in m^3 kg^-1/s^2 ?

And take a look here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_period
under Small body orbiting a central body it says t is in years and a is au's.
 
O i just saw your reply kirovman, thanks I am going to keep trying.
 
DB said:
Thanks. I am confused though. I've been wroking it out over and over and keep getting weird answers, I really can't see what to change. Should "a" be in metres because G is in m^3 kg^-1/s^2 ?

And take a look here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_period
under Small body orbiting a central body it says t is in years and a is au's.


I believe the problem is asking for the orbital period in seconds.We all know that the orbital period of Earth is 1 year,but we want to find that using physics and not our senses.

That formula
[tex]T(years)=\sqrt{a^{3}}[/tex] is not physically acceptable/correct.

Daniel.

PS.Physics is rigor.Dimensional analysis of mathematical expressions is essential.
 
  • #10
Bingo. Thanks guys. I'm happy :smile:

[tex]t_s=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{(149597887000 m)^3}{6.67 m^3/kg/s^2 * 2 kg}}*\sqrt{\frac{1}{10^{-11}*10^{30}}[/tex]

[tex]t_s=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{3.34*10^{33} m}{13.34}}*3.16*10^{-10}[/tex]

[tex]t_s=6.28*1.58*10^{16}*3.16*10^{-10}[/tex]

[tex]t_s=\frac{\frac{31354784}{3600}}{24}=362[/tex]

I made some stupid mistakes because I find it difficult dealing with m^3/kg/s^2, but now that I found out "a" should be in metres in worked out.
I'm really just doing this for the fun of it, for the sake of learning.

Thanks all.
 
  • #11
dextercioby said:
That formula
[tex]T(years)=\sqrt{a^{3}}[/tex] is not physically acceptable/correct.

ya it caused me a lot of stress
 
  • #12
DB said:
ya it caused me a lot of stress

Advice for future physics problems involving numerical calculations:
Always use the sign/s of approximation:
[tex]\approx[/tex] or [tex]\sim[/tex]
,when dealing with nonexact figures.

In your case,all "equal to" signs should have been "appox.equal to".

Daniel.

PS.Speed of light in vacuo is the only exception.
 
  • #13
T(years) = (a^3)^(1/2) IS physically acceptable IF using units of years and Astronomical Units (units that are actually used in astrophysics quite often). Things to note are: what are your dimensions? For almost any homework problem in physics, turn the dimensions given into S.I. if not given so. However, in much astronomical research, one must take care to convert to the units given in the field. For instance, in the area of close binary systems, masses are often given and calculated in terms of the Sun's mass, lengths in terms of the Sun's radius, time in days, and you will find in the literature as much. The bottom line is know what units are applicable, and know how to convert between the two. Happy physics everyone :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K