Register to reply 
Over estimate of dark matter 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb2406, 04:58 AM

PF Gold
P: 3,692

http://arxiv.org/abs/astroph/0602519
Authors: H. Balasin, D. Grumiller Comments: 11 pages revtex4, 4 eps figures Reportno: LUITP 2006/002 Exact stationary axially symmetric solutions of the 4D Einstein equations with corotating pressureless perfect fluid sources are studied. This is of physical relevance for the dynamics of galaxies and questions concerning dark matter. A particular solution with approximately flat rotation curve is discussed in some detail. We find that simple Newtonian arguments overestimate the amount of matter needed to explain these curves by more than 30%. 


#2
Feb2406, 08:39 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,977

That's very interesting. Basically, they've done an analysis similar to that of Cooperstock and Tieu (the "GR accounting for dark matter" folks), but avoiding all of the "exotic matter" and "singular disk" problems. They find that GR effects can account for a small (~30 percent), but nonnegligible, fraction of the dark matter. I must admit, it's still surprising to me that GR would be necessary at all in this limit, but I find this result to be much more plausible than the Cooperstock one.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Superb overview of contemporary research/observations in dark matter, dark energy  Cosmology  0  
Review of Dark Matter and Dark Energy by M. Kamionkowski  Cosmology  5  
Dark matter, dark energy & gravity  Cosmology  45  
Dark energy = dark matter*speed of light squared?  Astronomy & Astrophysics  14  
Dark matter doesn't (or what's the matter with dark matter? or pick your lame pun)  General Physics  4 