Register to reply

Over estimate of dark matter

by wolram
Tags: dark, estimate, matter
Share this thread:
Feb24-06, 04:58 AM
PF Gold
wolram's Avatar
P: 3,692

Authors: H. Balasin, D. Grumiller
Comments: 11 pages revtex4, 4 eps figures
Report-no: LU-ITP 2006/002

Exact stationary axially symmetric solutions of the 4D Einstein equations with co-rotating pressureless perfect fluid sources are studied. This is of physical relevance for the dynamics of galaxies and questions concerning dark matter. A particular solution with approximately flat rotation curve is discussed in some detail. We find that simple Newtonian arguments over-estimate the amount of matter needed to explain these curves by more than 30%.
Phys.Org News Partner Space news on
France raises heat on decision for next Ariane rocket
Buzzing with activity: Fruit flies orbit Earth for science
Miranda: An icy moon deformed by tidal heating
Feb24-06, 08:39 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
SpaceTiger's Avatar
P: 2,977
That's very interesting. Basically, they've done an analysis similar to that of Cooperstock and Tieu (the "GR accounting for dark matter" folks), but avoiding all of the "exotic matter" and "singular disk" problems. They find that GR effects can account for a small (~30 percent), but non-negligible, fraction of the dark matter. I must admit, it's still surprising to me that GR would be necessary at all in this limit, but I find this result to be much more plausible than the Cooperstock one.
Feb25-06, 01:30 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,495
Agreed, ST. It is a plausible approach. However, I question how well it would work with large scale structures.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Superb overview of contemporary research/observations in dark matter, dark energy Cosmology 0
Review of Dark Matter and Dark Energy by M. Kamionkowski Cosmology 5
Dark matter, dark energy & gravity Cosmology 45
Dark energy = dark matter*speed of light squared? Astronomy & Astrophysics 14
Dark matter doesn't (or what's the matter with dark matter? or pick your lame pun) General Physics 4