Thread Closed

Radiation Universe

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May28-06, 07:00 AM   #1
 

Radiation Universe


Not being very mathematically inclined, I'm stumped with this one. Can anyone help?

Imagine a toy “closed” universe in the form of a very large box (say the size of our universe) with perfectly rigid and reflecting walls. The box is static in size (neither expanding nor contracting) and is uniformly filled with electromagnetic radiation, with an average energy density Rho, and nothing else.

The electromagnetic radiation will exert mutual gravitational attraction (vie E=mc^2).

At low values of Rho, we would expect to see no gravitational clumping of this radiation, in other words the toy universe would be stable with a uniform distribution of radiation.

Q1) What value of Rho is required before we observe gravitational clumping of the radiation (if at all)?

Q2) What value of Rho is required before we observe black holes forming?

Q3) If it is possible to spontaneously form black holes at high values of Rho, what would be the equilibrium mix of black holes vs background radiation as a function of Rho (taking into account the fact that black holes emit Hawking radiation)?

Best Regards

MF
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Jun2-06, 06:44 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by moving finger
Not being very mathematically inclined, I'm stumped with this one. Can anyone help?

Imagine a toy “closed” universe in the form of a very large box (say the size of our universe) with perfectly rigid and reflecting walls. The box is static in size (neither expanding nor contracting) and is uniformly filled with electromagnetic radiation, with an average energy density Rho, and nothing else.

The electromagnetic radiation will exert mutual gravitational attraction (vie E=mc^2).

At low values of Rho, we would expect to see no gravitational clumping of this radiation, in other words the toy universe would be stable with a uniform distribution of radiation.

Q1) What value of Rho is required before we observe gravitational clumping of the radiation (if at all)?

Q2) What value of Rho is required before we observe black holes forming?
The last time I thought about this I convinced myself that we would only observe "clumping" when the density was sufficient to form a black hole.

I don't have a really solid argument for this, though - my thinking is that if we draw a sphere around a clump of radiation of a density less than that required to form a black hole, that the radiation should be expanding on the average. Thus on the average there would be no tendency to "clump", there would be a tendency to "expand".

The argument isn't airtight, esp. if the radiation isn't really random.

Q3) If it is possible to spontaneously form black holes at high values of Rho, what would be the equilibrium mix of black holes vs background radiation as a function of Rho (taking into account the fact that black holes emit Hawking radiation)?
I don't think you'd have multiple black holes in the box. The larger the box, the lower the critical density. When you exceed the critical density, the whole box should become a black hole.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Radiation Universe
Thread Forum Replies
If the observable universe were the entire universe, would the mass make it expand? Cosmology 7
Planck black-box radiation and the universe Cosmology 1
Radiation in universe Cosmology 1
Origin of the Universe: Created Universe vs Cyclical Universe General Astronomy 9
EM radiation and Nuclear Radiation Classical Physics 6