
#1
Jun2406, 10:01 AM

P: 89

This mainly goes out to the professional mathematicians, but what would be your assessment of the Millennium Problems?
In the sense of which would be the most difficult, which might be solved first, the current status of the problems within the community itself. Not necessarily all of them, maybe the one or two that pertain to your area. I ask because I was listening to an algebraist and topologist at my university talk about the Poincaré conjecture and found the discussion fascinating. In essence I'm looking for a discussion on the problems, focusing on their current status and opinions of mathematicians in the relevant fields of what their future will be. 



#2
Jun2406, 11:09 AM

P: 131

Have you read the book "The Millenium Problems" by Keith Devlin? It does a great job of summarizing the problems for the nonexpert. From what I remember, Devlin claims that the P vs. NP problem is the "easiest" by which he means that it is the most likely to be solved by a nonprofessional, however unlikely. As for the most difficult, he spends a lot of time on the Hodge Conjecture explaining to the reader that they will basically never understand the details, though he does make an attempt.
If you like this book, I would like to recommend "Prime Obsession" by John Derbyshire also. It is an in depth look at the history and mathematics behind the Riemann Hypothesis. 



#3
Jun2406, 03:37 PM

P: 89

Read it a while ago, it's good, but I'd prefer a more indepth look at the problems.
Unfortunately I can't seem to find any literature dealing with the problems and their place in the community. (Of course there is no problem finding literature concerning the problems themselves.) 



#4
Jun2406, 03:47 PM

P: 499

Millennium Problems
I seem to remember reading somewhere (possibly in the book itself) that Devlin's "The Millennium Problems" book was to be the forerunner of a larger work describing the problems at a more advanced level. However it looks like the later work never materialised.




#5
Jun2406, 03:55 PM

P: 89

The actual problem descriptions themselves are worth sitting down with and reading, very reminiscent of the Hilbert problems in how they are stated although you can see that it's a different generation. Good for a contrast between 19th and 20th century mathematics, or at least I found so. 



#6
Jul206, 09:26 AM

P: 89




#7
Jul206, 09:36 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,996

A nice survey article: http://www.ams.org/notices/200303/feaconreyweb.pdf 



#8
Jul606, 08:37 PM

P: 218

My money goes on the Rhiemann Hypothesis not bc I understand it but because it made it to the otp of the lsit from the 19th century list into 20th.




#9
Jul1106, 01:28 PM

P: 28





#10
Jul2206, 08:49 AM

P: 501

Riemann Hypothesis solution could be easy to solve for a Physicist if HilbertPolya operator is constructible...so is "equivalent to a Hamiltonian
[tex] \zeta(1/2+iH)n>=0 [/tex] [tex] Hn>=E_n n> [/tex] 



#11
Jul2406, 06:31 AM

P: 501

http://arxiv.org/ftp/math/papers/0607/0607095.pdf
A very curious paper on RH Thermodynamics and Chebyshev explicit formula... 



#12
Jul2406, 07:17 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,132




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
The Millennium problems  General Math  16  
Energy Question [The Millennium Force]  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
The Millennium Question.  General Discussion  32  
Gods of the new millennium  General Discussion  2  
Sun more active than for a millennium: New Scientist  General Astronomy  11 