How Many Trees Are Needed to Supply Enough Oxygen for 30 People in a Year?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nibles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trees
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the number of trees required to supply enough oxygen for 30 people over the course of a year. Participants explore various factors influencing oxygen production, including tree size, species, and human oxygen consumption rates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the feasibility of determining a specific number of trees needed for oxygen supply, citing the variability in tree size and species, which affects oxygen output.
  • Others suggest that understanding average oxygen production per tree and average human consumption rates would be necessary for making estimates.
  • One participant highlights the complexity of human oxygen needs, which can vary based on individual health factors.
  • There is mention of the influence of CO2 availability on a tree's oxygen production.
  • Some argue that older trees may not be net producers of oxygen and that oceans contribute significantly more oxygen than trees.
  • A participant expresses frustration in finding reliable data on average human oxygen consumption rates, referencing various sources that do not provide clear figures.
  • Links to external resources are shared in hopes of finding more information on the topic.
  • One participant humorously suggests that a rough estimate might be as low as three trees per person, referencing an elementary school source.
  • Another participant brings up the Biosphere project as a related example of oxygen supply challenges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that multiple factors influence oxygen production and consumption, but there is no consensus on specific numbers or methods for estimating the number of trees needed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in available data regarding average oxygen consumption rates for humans and the variability in tree oxygen output based on species and age.

Nibles
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am, for some reason, unable to post in the "earth" board, so here I am.

How many trees does it take to provide enough oxygen for one human? How large would these trees be?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Why not show us what you have so far? As I am sure you would not want us to tell you the answer.

Nautica
 
You can't say how many trees of what size would make a sufficient amount of o2 for a human, since the size of a tree does not automatically give it a set o2 output. A better question would be how many photosynthetic cells with how many chloroplast acting how quickly would be needed to supply a human with oxygen.

Also, human oxygen needs vary depending on the mass of the person, how strong their heart is, how healthy their lungs are and many other factors, so you'd need to state how much oxygen your human intakes, or give some sort of description of the person for anyone to be able to figure it out beyond a rough estimate.
 
Here's where it would be useful to do averages. How much does oxygen does the average tree (or generalize to large plant) produce, and how much does the average human consume? After you pin that down you can go to distributions on both sides.
 
Do you think a bonsai tree, japanese maple, and redwood have anywhere near the same o2 output?

But yeah, you could average human o2 needs.
 
3
But if you have a car (hint:ask on engineering forum)...:smile:
 
I'm thinking: wouldn't it also vary greatly with the amount of the CO2 supply to the tree?
 
There are *many* factors that impact the oxygen production of a tree. Older trees can actually be higher net "users" of oxygen, not net "producers". The ocean produces much more oxygen than all of the trees combined.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
"Here's where it would be useful to do averages." "...how much does the average human consume?"

Exactly my thinking, but I went a-searchin' and couldn't find that information. Giot pretty furstrating, actually; there are all kinds of reference to "VO2-MAX" ( the amount of O2 consumed during maximum exrtion) in the medical science sites, but none of them used a resting rate of consumtion for a baseline.

NASA.Gov has an entire tutorial about provisions for space travel, and they talk about the need for "enough Oxygen for each crew member", but never mention how much that is.

Can anybody else find an average number?
 
  • #11
I remember once that Chroot (I think it was him at least) said that a rough estimate for an o2 supply/concentration was, assuming the pressure of the air is the same as it is at sea-level, you'd need the air to be composed of 16% oxygen.
 
  • #12
Originally posted by wasteofo2
I remember once that Chroot (I think it was him at least) said that a rough estimate for an o2 supply/concentration was, assuming the pressure of the air is the same as it is at sea-level, you'd need the air to be composed of 16% oxygen.
Are you referring to the article I posted? "Now, on an average, cool,
clear day, only 21% of that air is oxygen." Or does no one read my posts? [b(]
 
  • #13
No, it was in that thread I made asking if deforestation could lead to the lack of ability to light fires. People said we'd all be dead before we couldn't light fires, so I needn't worry about it and chroot said that due to his scuba-diving experience he's learned that a safe amount of o2 is 16 atmospheres partial pressue, meaning that you need 16% o2 concentration and the same pressure that is found at sea-level to stay concious. Though he said that was playing it safe, and some can survive with only 10 atmospheres partial pressure.
 
  • #14
Well I see no one took my post seriously, but I wasn’t kidding with that 3 number :)
I remembered it from some elementary school book (it’s probably 3 assumption)……

cheers
 
  • #15
Originally posted by eagleone
Well I see no one took my post seriously, but I wasn’t kidding with that 3 number :)
I remembered it from some elementary school book (it’s probably 3 assumption)
Dubious. Looking at the issue from another angle, you guys remember the Biosphere project and why it failed...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K