Fairly basic algebra question - but it's bugging me now

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the manipulation of fractions and negative signs in algebra, particularly in the context of linear interpolation. The user, Kel, questions how the expression (x2-x1) can be rewritten as (x1-x2) and seeks clarification on the rules governing these transformations. The responses clarify that moving a negative sign to the denominator is valid, provided the corresponding values are adjusted accordingly, and emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of the equation throughout the manipulation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear interpolation
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of fractions
  • Knowledge of gradient equations
  • Basic principles of negative numbers in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear interpolation in-depth
  • Learn about algebraic fraction manipulation techniques
  • Explore gradient calculations in calculus
  • Investigate common pitfalls in algebraic rearrangements
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching algebra, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of algebraic manipulation and linear interpolation concepts.

kel
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm just going through some notes on linear interpolation, but this bit has got me confused - I think it's an easy work through on gradients etc, but my maths seems to be failing me (mature student here so go easy on me :shy: )

Ok here goes (see attached images - not sure about latex yet. A look at image 2 first, it just shows the gradient equation)

My question is: How can e.g. (x2-x) become (x-x2), I was always taught that when you move the lower part of a division/fraction to the other side of the equals sign, you don't change it! So, how does this work?

Is there some trick that occurs when you rearrange an equation or is there some maths rule that I was never taught.

I know this is probably a solve in 2 seconds type question, but it's starting to bug me now !

Cheer
Kel
 

Attachments

  • Image2.gif
    Image2.gif
    966 bytes · Views: 564
  • Image1.gif
    Image1.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 644
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not post your questions in the tutorial section!
A mentor will move this thread to where it belongs.
 
Whoops! Sorry, forgot which area I was in. o:)

Please moderator (any one of you) please could you move this to the relevant area.

Thankyou!
 
kel said:
Hi,
I'm just going through some notes on linear interpolation, but this bit has got me confused - I think it's an easy work through on gradients etc, but my maths seems to be failing me (mature student here so go easy on me :shy: )

Ok here goes (see attached images - not sure about latex yet. A look at image 2 first, it just shows the gradient equation)

My question is: How can e.g. (x2-x) become (x-x2), I was always taught that when you move the lower part of a division/fraction to the other side of the equals sign, you don't change it! So, how does this work?

Is there some trick that occurs when you rearrange an equation or is there some maths rule that I was never taught.
Well, there is NO (x2-x) that becomes (x-x2)! You mean "How can (x2-x1) become (x1-x2).
You have
y= \frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}(x- x_1)+ y_2
and it becomes
y= y_1\frac{x-x_1}{x_1-x_2}+ y_2\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}
Actually that is wrong but not because of the switch of (x2-x1) to (x1-x2).
What you do have is
\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}(x- x_1)= y2\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}- y_1\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}[/itex]<br /> Do you see that it is <b>negative</b> y<sub>1</sub> times the fraction? Take that negative into the denominator of the fraction:<br /> -y_1\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}= y_1\frac{x-x_1}{x_1-x_2}<br /> <br /> What <b>is</b> wrong is that the last &quot;y<sub>2[/sup]&quot; has been dropped! did you mean <br /> y- y_2= y_1\frac{x-x_1}{x_1-x_2}+ y_2\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}<br /> y- y_2= y_1A_1(x)+ y_2A_2(x)?<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> I know this is probably a solve in 2 seconds type question, but it&#039;s starting to bug me now ! <br /> <br /> Cheer<br /> Kel </div> </div> </blockquote></sub>
 
Actually, I just lifted it straight from the course text (pdf file). So any errors will be in the original teaching notes.

Cheers
kel
 
So basically I can take the minus sign down to the denominator, but then I have to switch the numbers in the demominator to keep the value of the overall multiplication the same ie -2(1/3-1) = 2(1/1-3), I worked these both to be -1, so I guess it works.

Can I also ask, how does this work when you have a long denominator ie -2(1/(2+3-5)*2) can you still move the minus sign down? do I just have to change the +'s to -'s or would I have to rearrange.

Thanks again
Kel
 
kel said:
So basically I can take the minus sign down to the denominator, but then I have to switch the numbers in the demominator to keep the value of the overall multiplication the same ie -2(1/3-1) = 2(1/1-3), I worked these both to be -1, so I guess it works.

Can I also ask, how does this work when you have a long denominator ie -2(1/(2+3-5)*2) can you still move the minus sign down? do I just have to change the +'s to -'s or would I have to rearrange.

Thanks again
Kel
You can "move" a minus sign wherever you want:
-\frac{a}{b}= \frac{-a}{b}= \frac{a}{-b}
In the example you give
-2\frac{1}{(2+ 3-5)^2}= \frac{2}{-(2+3-5)^2}= \frac{-2}{(2+3-5)^2}[/itex]<br /> Of course, sinced 2+3-5= 0 that fraction doesn&#039;t exist wherever the &quot;-&quot; is! (Were you trying to catch me?)
 
Nope, just made that question up on the spot.

Thanks for your help
Kel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K