Kardashev Scale: Size vs Energy Output

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Output Scale
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Kardashev Scale, which categorizes civilizations based on their energy output and technological advancement. Participants explore the implications of size versus energy output in defining civilization types, as well as the validity of fictional examples used to illustrate these types.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Kardashev Scale defines civilizations by their energy output, with Type I, II, and III corresponding to energy outputs of 1.74×1017 W, 3.86×1026 W, and 1036 W, respectively.
  • There is a debate about whether size or energy output is more critical in determining a civilization's classification, with some arguing that energy output should be the primary factor.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of harnessing all energy from a planet without converting its mass into energy, raising concerns about the assumptions behind achieving Type I status.
  • Another participant critiques the use of fictional civilizations, like those in Star Wars, suggesting that their energy outputs may not align with the Kardashev classifications.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the scientific validity of the Kardashev Scale, noting the limitations of having only one known civilization (Earth) as a reference point.
  • There are references to the societal implications of energy consumption, comparing the Kardashev Scale to the resource usage patterns of different countries on Earth.
  • One participant humorously suggests that their household is on the verge of becoming a Type II civilization due to energy management issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the Kardashev Scale, with no clear consensus on the importance of size versus energy output, the validity of fictional examples, or the scientific merit of the scale itself. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the assumptions underlying the Kardashev Scale, particularly regarding the classification of fictional civilizations and the implications of using Earth as the sole example of a civilization.

Arian
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
The Kardashev Scale is a scale (duh) that judges civilizations based on their energy output.

There are Three Types:

Type I: 1.74×1017 W

Type II: 3.86×1026 W

Type III: 10^36 W


Now, its is said that civilizations will grow like this:

Type I: Uses the energy output of One Planet

Type II: Uses the energy output of a star and its planets.

Type III: Uses the energy of an entire galaxy, the black holes, stars, and planets in it.


But here is a problem: the examples used to describe these types (Star Wars, Star Trek, and others) may not be true types.

Example:

The Star Wars Civilization covers most of its galaxy, yet its main power sources are disputed, claiming its energy output does not make it a type three.

If we assume this is true, its power source is still a galaxy, but not enough energy o make it a type III.
\

So the question is:

Which is more important? Size? or energy output?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arian said:
The Kardashev Scale is a scale (duh) that judges civilizations based on their energy output.

There are Three Types:

Type I: 1.74×1017 W

Type II: 3.86×1026 W

Type III: 10^36 W


Now, its is said that civilizations will grow like this:

Type I: Uses the energy output of One Planet

Type II: Uses the energy output of a star and its planets.

Type III: Uses the energy of an entire galaxy, the black holes, stars, and planets in it.


But here is a problem: the examples used to describe these types (Star Wars, Star Trek, and others) may not be true types.

Example:

The Star Wars Civilization covers most of its galaxy, yet its main power sources are disputed, claiming its energy output does not make it a type three.

If we assume this is true, its power source is still a galaxy, but not enough energy o make it a type III.
\

So the question is:

Which is more important? Size? or energy output?

I believe that the definition is based on total energy used by the civilization averaged over a 1 year time period. This gives the possibility for a fairly low-tech civilization that spawns a galaxy to have a high Kardashev rating.

However, if you look at http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Beam/DeathStar.html

for instance, you'll see that Star Wars technology can apparently generate at least 2*10^32 joules in one shot, suggesting that the Star Wars tech level can control and generate very high levels of energy. (Most of the movie does not portray this, though, this is more or less an isolated incident.)

The capability of making 50 such shots in a year would put Star Wars at the K2 level, considering only the Death star's power requirements.

Why a K2+ level civilization is messing around with manually piloted fighters is somewhat of a mystery, though. Star Wars doesn't really make sense if you try to take it seriously on a scientific level.

I rather like Ian Banks "The Culture" as a fictional representation of a K2-K3 level civilization. It probably doesn't make any actual sense either, but it's not quite as grossly inconsistent as Star Wars.
 
is it really possible to harness all the energy from one planet without converting all the mass into energy?

assuming you are using only that planet, not a whole galaxy to achieve K1 status...
 
Dr. Michio Kaku and Type 1, 2 and 3 Civilizations

The Kardashev scale is a general method of classifying how technologically advanced a civilization is. It was first proposed in 1964 by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev. The scale has three designated categories called Type I, II, and III. These are based on the amount of usable energy a civilization has at its disposal, and the degree of space colonization. In general terms, a Type I civilization has achieved mastery of the resources of its home planet, Type II of its solar system, and Type III of its galaxy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

We would be a Type 0 Civilization in transition to a Type 1.

Here's some interesting info on this:
http://destinationtype1.blogspot.com

Here's a video by Dr. Michio Kaku.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=V7FVjATcqvc

What do you think of Type 1, 2 and 3 Civilizations?

Do you think we will make it to a Type 1 Civilization?
 


Like most things in cosmology (e.g. Drake equation), it's hard to tell if this is absolutely retarded or absolutely genius. I'm going with the prior because let's face it, a sample size of "1" doesn't really help when classifying civilisations.

Why don't we look to Earth and assume it's like a fractal? We have first world, second world and third world countries with exponential increase in resource usage as we go up. I guess that's the same principle, and I'm not sure if that's utterly stupid or utterly clever.

We're not in any fit state to progress, that's damned well assured.
 


maybe...either that or we die. It will be an epic battle of epic proportions...causing us to eliminate each other.
 


dst said:
Like most things in cosmology (e.g. Drake equation), it's hard to tell if this is absolutely retarded or absolutely genius. I'm going with the prior because let's face it, a sample size of "1" doesn't really help when classifying civilisations.

Why don't we look to Earth and assume it's like a fractal? We have first world, second world and third world countries with exponential increase in resource usage as we go up. I guess that's the same principle, and I'm not sure if that's utterly stupid or utterly clever.

We're not in any fit state to progress, that's damned well assured.

and yes...you make some sense. The transition from Old Order to New Order is still taking up time and effort.
 
emason, please search for similar threads before you start a new one.

Thanks.
 
Considering that this scale seems to start out on a planetary level, and we only know of one such civilization (our own), I fail to see how this is a scientific topic (N=1?). I'm moving this to philosophy.
 
  • #10


emason said:
Do you think we will make it to a Type 1 Civilization?
I can't get the kids to turn out the lights when they leave a room. My house is on the verge of becoming a type II civilization.
 

Similar threads

High School Explanations about Kardashev type 1 civilizations
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Graduate Will Future Civilizations Really Harness the Energy of Stars?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Graduate Future Civilizations and Energy Production
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Undergrad Abundant water from primordial supernovae at cosmic dawn
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
High School Star Lifespan Near Black Hole: Time Dilation & Energy
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad Tidal effects of galaxies orbiting one another with dark energy?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Does energy currency make sense?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can a Death Star weapon actually be built?
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
Undergrad M31-2014-DS1, slow disappearance of a massive star
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Deur Gravitational self-interaction Doesn't Explain Galaxy Rotation Curves
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K