- #1
neh4pres
- 45
- 0
I would like to know, how much a stars life would appear to lengthen relativisticly as observed from earth, if the star was in a close orbit around a supermasive black hole. If the stars lifespan is longer from our perspective than a star of its size should be, would it also appear to be outputting less energy than it actually is in its own reference frame?
If time dilation does not make the star dimmer from a far away reference frame, would that not be a paradox in mass energy conversion? Where a far away observer sees more energy output over the stars life than was actually produced?
The question comes from a twist on the scene in interstellar, where I'm replacing people, or the planet with a star, if that helps to understand the question.
If time dilation does not make the star dimmer from a far away reference frame, would that not be a paradox in mass energy conversion? Where a far away observer sees more energy output over the stars life than was actually produced?
The question comes from a twist on the scene in interstellar, where I'm replacing people, or the planet with a star, if that helps to understand the question.