Thread Closed

truth tables

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan20-07, 02:41 PM   #1
 

truth tables


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

This is just a simple logic question that I need a little guidance.
Let X= "I like cars"
Let Y= "I like trees"
Let ~ = not
Let V = or

How would this be written in symbols:
1. It is not the case that I like cars or I like trees
2. It is not the case that I like cars, or I like trees

2. Relevant equations

none

3. The attempt at a solution

1. ~X V Y
2. ~(X V Y)
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
>> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt
>> Galaxy's Ring of Fire
Jan21-07, 03:16 AM   #2
 
your answers should be vice versa I think
 
Jan21-07, 05:50 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
First statement: "It is not the case that: (I like cars or I like trees).

Second statement: (It is not the case that I like cars) or (it is not the case that I like trees).

I agree with theperthvan.
 
Jan21-07, 06:00 AM   #4
 

truth tables


that's what I thought, but the examples in the book gives the following:

P=Irene has red hair

PV~P = "Irene has red hair or she dos not have red hair"

if what you say is correct, then the example should say:

PV~P = "Irene has red hair, or she dos not have red hair"
 
Jan21-07, 06:05 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
?? The only difference I see is a comma which, grammatically, is optional here. Both sentences mean the same thing.
 
Jan21-07, 06:48 AM   #6
 
then shouldn't this be the same thing as well?
1. It is not the case that I like cars or I like trees
2. It is not the case that I like cars, or I like trees

Say X- I like cars and Y=I like trees
then using the example from the book
PV~P = "Irene has red hair or she dos not have red hair"
i could say ~X V Y, which would read: "I do not like cars or I like trees"

looking back at
1. It is not the case that I like cars or I like trees

would this be ~X V Y and not ~(X V Y)
 
Jan21-07, 10:24 AM   #7
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
Second statement: (It is not the case that I like cars) or (it is not the case that I like trees).
The statement: "It is not the case that I like cars, or I like trees" also could read "(It is not the case that I like cars) or (It is the case that I like trees)".
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: truth tables
Thread Forum Replies
Truth Tables and K-Maps Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Show that the conditional statement is a Tautology without using truth tables... Precalculus Mathematics Homework 1
Sets: Proofs: Truth Tables? General Math 3