Congratulations to Demystifier

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas Larsson
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the peculiar arXiv title "Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born?" which has been highlighted as the weirdest title of the year. Participants express appreciation for the title's tongue-twisting nature and its cleverness. There is also mention of a paper by Harvey Nikolic that explores quantum mechanics' locality and nonlocality, suggesting that different interpretations of quantum mechanics can be viewed as distinct algorithms. The conversation acknowledges the acceptance of a revised version of the original paper for publication. Overall, the thread celebrates unique academic contributions and their intriguing titles.
Physics news on Phys.org
Thomas Larsson said:
for the weirdest arXiv title of the year, so far:
"Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born?"

Not only weird, it is a great tongue-twistor. Try to say it fast.

I saw that Harvey Nikolic paper too and thought about starting a thread, but didn't know whether DeMyst'er liked to remain anonymous
so that we shouldn't mention it. I guess not.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!
I uncoverd my identity several times on this forum, so do I not have a reason to hide my identity.
 
another paper by one of our distinguished "Beyond the Standard" forum authors
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703071
Quantum nonlocality without hidden variables: An algorithmic approach
H. Nikolic
4 pages

"Is quantum mechanics (QM) local or nonlocal? Different formulations/interpretations (FI) of QM, with or without hidden variables, suggest different answers. Different FI's can be viewed as different algorithms, which leads us to propose an algorithmic definition of locality according to which a theory is local if and only if there exists at least one FI in which all irreducible elements of that FI are local. The fact that no such FI of QM is known strongly supports quantum nonlocality."
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K