Intuitive explanation of gravity outside a sphere?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the gravitational force exerted by a spherical mass on a distant point, specifically why this force can be treated as if all the mass were concentrated at the center. Participants are exploring intuitive explanations and comparisons with other shapes, such as rings and disks, in the context of gravitational interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive an intuitive understanding of gravitational force from spherical and ring distributions. Questions are raised about the conditions under which the simplification holds and whether similar principles apply to other geometries.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights based on symmetry and questioning the assumptions behind the gravitational force's behavior. Some guidance on the role of uniform density and symmetry has been provided, but there remains a lack of consensus on a fully intuitive explanation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for uniform density for certain results to hold, and participants are considering the implications of gravitational behavior at varying distances from the mass distributions.

jacobfreeze
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have an intuitive explanation why the gravitational force of a sphere on a distant point is the same as if all the sphere's mass were concentrated at the center? The usual integration over spherical shells goes through o.k. but the result is so simple it seems to me that maybe we could get there by insight instead of calculation...or at least part of the way there...
Do we have the same result for a disk or a ring and a point in the same plane? Is the gravitational force of a ring on a point in the same plane equivalent to the force from the same mass concentrated at the center of the ring?
I think this is true...so is there an intuitive way to get this result in the simpler case of a ring and a co-planar point, and does the spherical case then follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, that's only true if the density is uniform (unless by "distantpoint" the limit as distance goes to infinity). I'm not sure what you would consider "intuitive" but the simplest way to think about it is through symmetry. Take any point outside the uniform, spherical mass. Draw a line from the point to the center of the sphere (I'm going to call that the "center line"). For any point on the sphere, there is a "symmetrically opposite" point (equal distance on other side of the center line). The component of graviational force perpendicular to the center line of the two points are equal and opposite and so cancel. That is, the force is directed to the center of the sphere.

The "very distant" (limit as distance goes to infinity) case is even more "intuitive": any figure, of any density, seen from far enough away looks like a point!
 
I don't get your reasoning, Halls. Your argument shows that the force acts along the center line, but does not imply (as far as I can see) that the magnitude of the force is the same as if the mass were at the center.

I can't think of a simple intuitive explanation. Of course, you can apply Gauss's theorem to gravity, but that requires explanation (for those unfamiliar with the Poisson equation for gravity).
 
HallsofIvy's response misses the point of my question, but it brings up another aspect...Is the theorem true for any sperically symmetric distribution? The analogy with Gauss' theorem suggests that it is.
But still no insight about why the force operates from the center. I'm not necessarily looking for a complete proof...just a little improvement over watching the result fall out of an integral.
 
Originally posted by jacobfreeze
...Is the theorem true for any spherically symmetric distribution?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
7K