Calculating Height of Rolling Marble

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a marble of mass M and radius R rolling down a track from a height h1 and then ascending a frictionless track to a height h2, where h2 is less than h1. Participants are tasked with determining the value of h2 based on energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks hints on how to approach the problem. Some participants discuss the role of friction in the energy transformation as the marble rolls down and up the tracks. There is mention of calculating the moment of inertia and how it relates to the marble's motion. Others suggest that the energy conservation equations can be set up to find h2, with some participants questioning the correctness of the derived expressions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have engaged in discussing the energy transformations involved in the marble's motion. While one participant provides a detailed analysis leading to a proposed value for h2, another requests further explanation before confirming the answer. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the underlying physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, focusing on the principles of energy conservation and the effects of friction on rolling motion. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between potential energy, translational kinetic energy, and rotational kinetic energy.

cristina
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
A marble of mass M and radius R rolls without slipping down the track on the left from a height h1. The marble then goes up the frictionless track on the right to a height h2 where h2<h1 . Find h2.
I don't know how to think of this one, any hints please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If there was friction on h1 and no friction on h2, there is no way h2 is higher than h1.

On h1, the friction makes it roll. So you need to know the moment of inertia.

[tex]I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2 + mR^2[/tex]

[tex]I = \frac{7}{5}mR^2[/tex]


At the bottom of the first track, the rotational energy will equal the initial gravitational energy

[tex]\frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2 = mgh[/tex]

[tex]\frac{7}{10}mR^2 \omega ^2 = mgh_1[/tex]

[tex]\omega ^2 = \frac{10gh_1}{7R^2}[/tex]


Now write the energy from rolling down h1 a different way, this time rotating around the centre with the centre of rotation moving down the slope

[tex]\frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{1}{5}mR^2 (\frac{10gh_1}{7R^2})[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{10}{35}mgh_1[/tex]

Now that kinetic energy (the left side of that equation) is the one that makes the marble go up to h2, so make an equation for that.

[tex]mgh_2 = mgh_1 - \frac{10}{35}mgh_1[/tex]

[tex]mgh_2 = \frac{25}{35}mgh_1[/tex]

cancel the m and the g

[tex]h_2 = \frac{25}{35}h_1[/tex]



Can somebody confirm this answer?
 
Last edited:
May you please give some explanation before confirming the answer?
Thank you.
 
cristina said:
May you please give some explanation before confirming the answer?
ShawnD's analysis is correct, but can be simplified. Here's how to understand what's going on:

When the ball rolls down the track there is friction causing it to roll without slipping. Remember that the condition for rolling without slipping is V = ωR.

The ball starts with an initial gravitational PE = mgh1. As the ball rolls down, that PE is converted to translational KE (1/2mV2) and rotational KE about the center of mass (1/2Iω2). Remember that the two KEs are tied by V = ωR.

When the ball rolls up the track, there is no friction so the rotational KE remains fixed. Only the translational KE is converted to gravitational PE = mgh2. So, solve for the translational KE at the bottom of track using:
mgh1 = 1/2mV2 + 1/2Iω2, along with: V = ωR.
Remember you are solving for 1/2mV2, so don't do any unnecessary work. Your answer will be some multiple of mgh1. Now set that equal to mgh2, and solve for h2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K