Why Do We Measure Pressure in mm of Hg and Observe Changes with Area?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter christym
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of pressure in millimeters of mercury (mm of Hg) and the observation that pressure decreases as the area increases. Participants explore the historical context of pressure measurement, the implications of the pressure-area relationship, and various examples illustrating these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that measuring pressure in mm of Hg is historically linked to atmospheric pressure and the behavior of a mercury column in a barometer.
  • Others argue that if the force remains constant, pressure must decrease as the area increases, as dictated by the formula pressure = force / area.
  • A participant questions the relevance of the area over which atmospheric pressure is applied to the mercury column, noting the variability in sizes of mercury columns.
  • Some examples are provided, such as the effect of widening a hose's aperture on water pressure and the impact of an object on a surface, suggesting that pressure dynamics can be complex.
  • One participant attempts to use numerical examples to illustrate their understanding of the pressure-area relationship, leading to confusion about the formula used.
  • Another participant clarifies that to maintain the same pressure over a larger area, the force must increase, referencing principles of hydraulics.
  • There is a correction regarding the formula for pressure, with emphasis on the correct relationship being pressure = force / area.
  • Participants discuss the distinction between static and dynamic pressure, indicating that pressure can vary with motion and is not always constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the pressure-area relationship, with some agreeing on the basic principles while others challenge the interpretations and applications of these concepts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of pressure measurement and the effects of area on pressure.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about force and area, as well as the definitions of static and dynamic pressure. Some participants express confusion over the mathematical relationships involved, indicating a need for clarity in the foundational concepts.

christym
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If pressure = force x area

1) why do we measure it in mm of Hg (distance)
2) why do I observe pressure to decrease as area increases

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Because historically an easy way to measure the variations (due to weather) in atmospheric pressure is by inverting a column of mercury (into an open-topped reservoir). The liquid continues to fall (leaving near-vacuum above) until the weight of the column equals the force applied at the bottom, i.e., the atmospheric pressure determines the height above a reservoir that mercury can be sucked by a vacuum.
2) You should explain fully the circumstances surrounding your observation.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF, Christym.
1) It's normally fluid, rather than mechanical, pressure that's measured as mm or inches of mercury or kilopascals. That's based upon the mercury barometer; the higher the air pressure, the higher it forces the column of mercury up the tube.
2) If the force remains the same, the pressure has to decrease as the area increases. That's dictated by the formula that you quoted.

edit: Hi, Cesiumfrog. Once again, you sneaked in while I was composing.
 
Last edited:
cesiumfrog said:
1) Because historically an easy way to measure the variations (due to weather) in atmospheric pressure is by inverting a column of mercury (into an open-topped reservoir). The liquid continues to fall (leaving near-vacuum above) until the weight of the column equals the force applied at the bottom, i.e., the atmospheric pressure determines the height above a reservoir that mercury can be sucked by a vacuum.

Thanks cesiumfrog,
Referring to that formula (pressure=force x area) then shouldn't it matter what the the area is, over which atmosphere is applied to the column of mercury? However I can't find any standards and these mercury columns seem to come in all sizes. It should matter shouldn't it?


2)
cesiumfrog said:
You should explain fully the circumstances surrounding your observation.

A couple of observation examples are, if I widen the aperture of a hose (increase the area) pressure of the water falls when measured at the end of the hose even if pressure at the source remains constant.

The impact of an object striking a surface causes less deviation in the surface as the surface area of the impact increases.
 
Thanks for your welcome Danger. This looks like an interesting place ..

Danger said:
2) If the force remains the same, the pressure has to decrease as the area increases. That's dictated by the formula that you quoted.

I'm missing something...
Just using simple values for an example:
If Force =5 and Area =3 then Pressure = 3 x 5 (=15).
If I increase area to 5 then the new formula would be Pressure = 5 x 5 (=25)

According to the formula pressure increases if area increases.

No?
 
No. To maintain the same pressure over a larger area, you would have to increase the force. It might be helpful for you to look into hydraulics. That is entirely based upon these principles. I'm certainly no expert, though, so you should listen to those such as FredGarvin, Brewnog, Astronuc, etc..
 
That should be pressure = force / area, for example in english units it's pounds / in^2.
 
christym said:
Thanks cesiumfrog,
Referring to that formula (pressure=force x area) then shouldn't it matter what the the area is, over which atmosphere is applied to the column of mercury? However I can't find any standards and these mercury columns seem to come in all sizes. It should matter shouldn't it?
Larger cross-sectional area implies greater atmospheric force but proportionally greater quantity and weight of mercury. So no, the only important variables would be ones like temperature, not shape.

christym said:
A couple of observation examples are, if I widen the aperture of a hose (increase the area) pressure of the water falls when measured at the end of the hose even if pressure at the source remains constant.
You are deceived: if you put your thumb over the end of the hose, the flow slows and the pressure becomes the same at both ends. If you release your thumb the pressure does not remain constant but decreases along the length of the hose (due to friction of the flow).

christym said:
The impact of an object striking a surface causes less deviation in the surface as the surface area of the impact increases.
Change in momentum = force = pressure x area. This observation confirms the relationship.

Danger said:
edit: Hi, Cesiumfrog. Once again, you sneaked in while I was composing.
Mwahahaha..
 
Last edited:
christym said:
Thanks cesiumfrog,
Referring to that formula (pressure=force x area) then shouldn't it matter what the the area is, over which atmosphere is applied to the column of mercury? However I can't find any standards and these mercury columns seem to come in all sizes. It should matter shouldn't it?
Just to make sure you caught it, your equation is wrong: p=f/a, not p=fa

So, the force depends on the weight of the column and the weight of the column is density times volume. Volume varies with area just as force does. So no, it doesn't matter what the area is. Try doing the math and you'll see that area cancels out of the equations.
A couple of observation examples are, if I widen the aperture of a hose (increase the area) pressure of the water falls when measured at the end of the hose even if pressure at the source remains constant.
That's a dynamic situation. Pressure varies with motion. That's called dynamic pressure. It isn't the same as static pressure and it is somewhat complicated to calculate if you've never been exposed to the idea. Let's get you understanding static pressure situations first.
The impact of an object striking a surface causes less deviation in the surface as the surface area of the impact increases.
That isn't true unless you are holding the force constant and changing the area. So that's not constant pressure. Constant pressure requires changing the force and the area together.
 
  • #10
Jeff Reid said:
That should be pressure = force / area, for example in english units it's pounds / in^2.

Dang! I should have caught that, but I still keep getting terms like 'work', 'force', 'energy', 'power' etc. mixed up. Maybe I should just type out all of the definitions and make it a 'stickie' on my screen. :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K