Register to reply

Dyslexia in the sciences

by billiards
Tags: dyslexia, sciences
Share this thread:
billiards
#1
Jan14-08, 02:08 PM
P: 748
Looking back I remember my first science teacher making a lot of spelling mistakes on the board. At uni I noticed that many of my colleagues were dyslexic, and quite a few of the lecturers were too but they were quite good at covering it up. Now I work with scientists and I have been shocked by the percentage of dyslexic people, it's a small office but about 15% have told me that they are dyslexic, and it's obvious that there are a few others who have problems with spelling. In fact, if you consider that I don't have enough contact with about 60% of the people in the office to pass judgement - I would say of the 40% I've worked closely enough with, about 50-60% are dyslexic to varying degrees.

Is this normal? Is this normal for just scientists? Or is this just me who's noticed this?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Evo
#2
Jan14-08, 02:13 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,557
They might just be poor spellers.
waht
#3
Jan14-08, 02:24 PM
P: 1,636
I'm dyslectic. My spelling is below average and it's good my browser has auto spelling. However, I have never encountered anyone that was dyslectic in my engineering classes though.

billiards
#4
Jan14-08, 02:55 PM
P: 748
Dyslexia in the sciences

Quote Quote by Evo View Post
They might just be poor spellers.
I thought that was the giveaway sympton of dyslexia.
matthyaouw
#5
Jan14-08, 03:09 PM
PF Gold
matthyaouw's Avatar
P: 1,216
At my university they seem to screen for dyslexia and other specific learning disabilities pretty readily. It's not compulsory, but it's made pretty clear that the option is there for whoever wants it. Staff may even suggest it if spelling is an issue in your work. At school on the other hand, I never really knew it to happen. I don't know if this is universal, but if so, perhaps university educated people are just more likely to have their dyslexia diagnosed than those who leave school earlier. It's (sadly) not that unusual for a person to leave compulsory schooling with poor English, so dyslexic students may be more likely to be missed, but at university level, you probably stand out a lot more for it.
Stingray
#6
Jan14-08, 03:30 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 674
Quote Quote by billiards View Post
I thought that was the giveaway sympton of dyslexia.
Most poor spellers are not dyslexic.

I've actually never met anyone in the sciences who I knew was dyslexic. I imagine it would be very difficult to get through so much schooling without being able to read properly. Many scientists do seem to have poor grammar and spelling skills, however.
Archon
#7
Jan14-08, 03:32 PM
P: 172
Quote Quote by billiards View Post
I thought that was the giveaway sympton of dyslexia.
Whether this is true or not (I'm not qualified to say), the fact that dyslexia is associated with spelling difficulties does not imply that the converse is true.

So it's definitely possible to have difficulty with spelling, and not be dyslexic.
rewebster
#8
Jan14-08, 04:19 PM
P: 880
this is what happens when you grow up with 'spellcheck'
billiards
#9
Jan14-08, 04:47 PM
P: 748
I find it hard to see how otherwise intelligent people can have such a problem with spelling unless they are dyslexic. I admit I don't know enough about it to diagnose the condition, so perhaps I have jumped the gun, allow me to rephrase:

Why is it that so many scientists are so awful at spelling?

Actually, I must say that science sites like this one, for the most part, attract members with spelling standards way above the norm. I find this to be anomalous, I can only think that this is a product of the American education system (I have lived in the UK all my life), I know that educated Yanks are generally more rounded than the Brits, and hence this could explain why (from my limited experience on this site) I find them to be better spellers.
binzing
#10
Jan14-08, 07:03 PM
P: 252
I have dysgraphia (so I think) because I write printed letters from the bottom up, and this year my science teacher is dysgraphic (where I found the term) and prints similarly to me. I hardly ever need to go back and correct things in my typing, so don't say all young people us spellcheck as a crutch.
mgb_phys
#11
Jan14-08, 07:13 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,953
Quote Quote by billiards View Post
Why is it that so many scientists are so awful at spelling?
They think faster than they can type? This is also the reason they stutter and stammer when speaking 'off the cuff' and have terrible handwriting.

Actually, I must say that science sites like this one, for the most part, attract members with spelling standards way above the norm.
I think they are just educated enough to put some effort into checkign and correcting typos. There is also a degree of peer-pressure, especially when someone quotes your typos!

Clinical dyslexia is quite rare. But it is commonly used as either a middle class excuse for thick kids (little Quentin didn't get straight As he must be dislexic) or it just means I can't spell and can't be bothered to check so I must be dyslexic.
It is getting to be a problem in UK state schools. They are now dominated by league tables of exam performance but you get allowances for any kids with 'special needs', kids with dyslexia are also allowed word processors or extra help in written exams and you can get extra money for teaching them. The result is a big rise in diagnosis of dyslexia in schools, especially schools in 'nice' areas with caring parents who want the kids to do well in exams and the school wants to do well in league tables.
NeoDevin
#12
Jan14-08, 07:40 PM
P: 687
Quote Quote by mgb_phys View Post
I think they are just educated enough to put some effort into checkign and correcting typos. There is also a degree of peer-pressure, especially when someone quotes your typos!
Hehe, had to do it!
mgb_phys
#13
Jan14-08, 07:42 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,953
And I had already gone back and corrected a typo in 'typo'
Evo
#14
Jan14-08, 08:16 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,557
I remember years ago, before dyslexia became a popular excuse for doing poorly in English, that it was a disorder in the brain that caused people with the condition to not be able to see numbers and letters in the correct order. The paper explained that a dyslexic person would, for example, not be able to read a street sign. Numbers and letters appear transposed to them.

It seems the "diagnosis" is now given to anyone that spells poorly. That's not dyslexia.
Moonbear
#15
Jan14-08, 08:24 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,270
Quote Quote by billiards View Post
I find it hard to see how otherwise intelligent people can have such a problem with spelling unless they are dyslexic.
It's just not their strength. I have a very good friend who is very intelligent, but the most horrendous speller I've met...it's become a joke between us. I tend to think spelling is something that requires proper teaching early in life to grasp all the rules. Dyslexia is not just bad spelling, but a learning disability where one sees letters jumbled out of order from the way they are actually printed. The people you know who are claiming to be dyslexic...have they actually been diagnosed with dyslexia, or are they just joking that that's their problem when they are just bad spellers? Someone with dyslexia is also a bad reader, because they can't see the words correctly.

Why is it that so many scientists are so awful at spelling?
The same reason so many other people are so bad at spelling?
mgb_phys
#16
Jan14-08, 08:40 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,953
Quote Quote by Moonbear View Post
I tend to think spelling is something that requires proper teaching early in life to grasp all the rules.
It helps but in English there are as many exceptions as rules!
I think it comes down to two things, reading enough that you recognise when words are spelt wrong and thinking it's important enough to correct them.
The majority of our writing today is typed, how much is bad spelling compared to just bad typing?
Sometimes it doesn't matter, you wouldn't correct spelling in a quick txt message or email in the same way you wouldn't script or rehearse a quick phone call.

(ps I did have to lookup rehearse !)
waht
#17
Jan14-08, 08:41 PM
P: 1,636
I've been diagnosed with dyslexia in 1st or 2nd grade as my learning development lacked behind peers. Spelling for me is mediocre at best. Handwriting is extremely illegible as I'm left handed as well. But there is way more to dyslexia than just spelling, and no two dyslectics are the same.
Evo
#18
Jan14-08, 08:44 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,557
Quote Quote by waht View Post
I've been diagnosed with dyslexia in 1st or 2nd grade as my learning development lacked behind peers. Spelling for me is mediocre at best. Handwriting is extremely illegible as I'm left handed as well. But there is way more to dyslexia than just spelling, and no two dyslectics are the same.
So when you look at words and numbers they are scrambled and you can't make them out? That's what true dsylexia was about. It's about how you see things.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Teen mother at 19 with dyslexia General Discussion 27
My battle with Dyslexia Medical Sciences 10
Are the sciences not gay friendly? Academic Guidance 2
Phylogeny sciences Academic Guidance 0
Dyslexia General Discussion 1