Why Does a Diffraction Grating Not Show Intermediate Intensity Patterns?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phenomenon of diffraction patterns produced by a laser passing through a diffraction grating, described by the equation nλ = d sinθ. It explains why intermediate intensity patterns are not visible, emphasizing that as more slits are added, the constructive interference peaks become more pronounced while the intermediate intensities are diminished. The original single-slit Fraunhofer pattern modulates the intensity of the multiple-slit interference, leading to the observation that only the most intense peaks are visible to the human eye, despite the presence of weaker intermediate intensities detectable by sensitive instruments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the diffraction grating equation nλ = d sinθ
  • Knowledge of Fraunhofer diffraction patterns
  • Familiarity with interference patterns from multiple slits
  • Basic principles of light behavior and wave interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of slit width on Fraunhofer diffraction patterns
  • Explore X-ray diffraction techniques and their applications
  • Learn about the modulation of interference patterns in multi-slit experiments
  • Investigate the sensitivity of human vision to varying light intensities
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, optical engineers, and researchers interested in wave optics and diffraction phenomena.

Blistering Peanut
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Since I'm on a roll,

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/9734/untitled.jpg

Laser shining through a diffraction grating produces several bright spots according to

[tex]n \lambda = d sin\theta[/tex]

I was wondering when the path difference isn't equal to or a multiple of the wavelength, why don't we see a pattern more like the one on the top right, with slightly constructive interference and completely destructive intereference halfway between each dot?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Blistering Peanut said:
Since I'm on a roll,

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/9734/untitled.jpg

Laser shining through a diffraction grating produces several bright spots according to

[tex]n \lambda = d sin\theta[/tex]

I was wondering when the path difference isn't equal to or a multiple of the wavelength, why don't we see a pattern more like the one on the top right, with slightly constructive interference and completely destructive intereference halfway between each dot?

OK, since no one is tackling this one, I will foolishly jump in! :)

Let me start with the single slit pattern and we'll see if I can explain the trend here as you add more and more slits. In a single slit, what you have is a Fraunhoffer pattern. You have a central bright "glob", followed by dark-bright-dark-etc globs. This is exactly what you were looking for, but for a single slit, i.e. you have varous degree of intensity in the pattern.

Now, let's add another slit to this, so we have a 2-slit case. What you now have is an ADDITIONAL set of interference pattern that is modulated by the ORIGINAL single-slit fraunhoffer pattern. In other words, the "criteria" for complete constructive and complete destructive is now more stringent. At the same time, the modulation of the intensity imposed by the original single-slit is still there.

You can tell that as you add more and more slits, only the constructive peaks will be the one most apparent TO YOUR EYE. The rest of the "in betweens" are there, but they are mostly washed out. Their intensities are still there, but your eye isn't sensitive enough to detect them. We know this because in X-ray diffraction experiments where the angular diffraction are scanned by photosensitive detectors, these "in-between" intensities are still present but highly diminished in strength when compared to the constructive peaks.

http://www.phy.davidson.edu/StuHome/grpatterson/Diffraction and Spatial Filtering/double_slit1.htm

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/DiffractionGrating.html

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K