Thread Closed

Quick Notation Question

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Mar5-08, 06:14 PM   #1
 

Quick Notation Question


Hey, I'm going through Hawking and Ellis and want to confirm I have understood some notation correctly.

Are the following correct?

[tex]V_{(c;d)}=\nabla_c V^d + \nabla_d V^c[/tex]

and

[tex]V_{[c;d]}=\nabla_c V^d - \nabla_d V^c[/tex]

Also, do these have specific names?

Thanks in advance!!

Richard
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Mar5-08, 07:37 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 47
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by robousy View Post
Hey, I'm going through Hawking and Ellis and want to confirm I have understood some notation correctly.

Are the following correct?

[tex]V_{(c;d)}=\nabla_c V^d + \nabla_d V^c[/tex]

and

[tex]V_{[c;d]}=\nabla_c V^d - \nabla_d V^c[/tex]

Also, do these have specific names?

Thanks in advance!!

Richard

[tex]V_{(c;d)}=\frac{1}{2!} \left( \nabla_d V_c + \nabla_c V_d \right)[/tex]

and

[tex]V_{[c;d]}=\frac{1}{2!}\left( \nabla_d V_c - \nabla_c V_d \right)[/tex]

The combinatorial factor is a convenient convention.
With it, you can call these the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of [tex]V_{c;d}[/tex].
You could call the antisymmetric part the "curl" of [tex]V_c[/tex].


Note that the operation
[tex]{(something)}_{;d}[/tex] is the same as [tex]\nabla_d (something)[/tex]
Mar5-08, 08:39 PM   #3
 
Ok Rob! Thanks a lot for clarifying that for me. Very much appreciated.

Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Quick Notation Question
Thread Forum Replies
Quick question on notation. Special & General Relativity 4
Quick notation question (QFT) Quantum Physics 3
Quick Notation Question Introductory Physics Homework 6
Quick question on notation General Math 4
Quick notation question General Math 2