Are Double Charge Particles Like -2 Electrons or +2 Protons Real?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Duom02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of particles with charges of -2 or +2, specifically in relation to electrons and protons. Participants explore definitions and models within the context of particle physics, particularly focusing on the standard model and related resonances.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that protons are defined to have a charge of +1, and thus a proton with a charge of +2 would not be classified as a proton.
  • Others acknowledge the definition of protons but express curiosity about the existence of other models or particles that might have different charge values.
  • One participant mentions the Δ++ resonance, which has a charge of +2, raising questions about classification and whether it should be considered a particle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that protons have a defined charge of +1, but there is disagreement regarding the existence and classification of particles with charges of -2 or +2, particularly in relation to the standard model.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of particles and the implications of charge values, as well as the classification of resonances versus fundamental particles.

Duom02
Are there such things as an electron wtih -2 on it? Or say a proton with +2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because a proton is defined to have a charge +1. If it were to have a charge +2, it would by definition no longer be a proton.

There are no particles in the standard model with charge +2 or -2.

- Warren
 
Yes I understand that a proton is only +1 I just forgot the name for that branch of particles.

But yeah i was wondering if there was a model which I guess there is not as you say.
 
If it had a -+2, it wouldn't be a proton. Protons have a specific amount of charge, and that value is deemed 1. So it's that 1 that defines what a proton is.
 
the Δ++ resonance has a charge +2. whether you want to call it a particle or not, now that s a different question.
 

Similar threads

High School Thought Experiment on Charge Carriers and Electrical Conduction
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Only one type of elementary electric charge?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
High School Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
High School In electrostatics, what is meant by positive charges?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
High School Magnetic Field & Particle Spin: Does It Matter?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
High School Problems I Have With Electrostatics and Pith Ball Experiments
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
High School Can positive charge move between charged bodies like electrons do?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
High School High voltage batteries and charge distribution
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad How is light related to charged particles?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Graduate Photons, Protons, and Electrons
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K