Thread Closed

riemann zeta function

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct11-08, 04:56 PM   #1
 

riemann zeta function


[tex]\zeta (s)= \frac{1}{(1-2^{1-s})} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac {1}{(2^{n+1})} \sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k{n \choose k}(k+1)^{-s} [/tex]

Is the main problem with trying to prove the hypothesis algebraically boil down to the fact that s is an exponent to a "k" term? Would a derivation of the function that had no k terms to an exponent s, be at all helpful to an algebraic approach to the hypothesis?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
Oct13-08, 06:40 PM   #2
 
This problem gives me a headache!
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: riemann zeta function
Thread Forum Replies
Riemann Zeta Function? Linear & Abstract Algebra 10
Riemann Zeta Function Calculus 8
more on riemann zeta function Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
riemann zeta function Linear & Abstract Algebra 12