Does This Cauchy Problem Have a Solution for Any Value of k?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vladimir69
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cauchy problem presented by Vladimir involves the equation u_x exp(y) + u_y exp(x) = 1 with the condition u(t, tk^2) = k exp(-t). The analysis concludes that there are no values of k that yield a unique solution, as the vectors (1, k^2) and (exp(t*k^2), exp(t)) must not be parallel, which leads to the conclusion that k cannot be both 0 and nonzero simultaneously. Additionally, the derived condition t = 2ln(k)/(1-k^2) indicates that no solutions exist for the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy problems in partial differential equations
  • Familiarity with vector analysis and cross products
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the conditions for uniqueness in Cauchy problems in PDEs
  • Study vector parallelism and its implications in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the role of exponential functions in differential equations
  • Practice using LaTeX for mathematical expressions to improve efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying partial differential equations, and anyone interested in the analysis of Cauchy problems and vector calculus.

vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
hi
this is my first attempt at using the latex commands ..
consider this Cauchy Problem:
[tex] u_x\exp y +u_y\exp(x)=1[/tex]
[tex] u(t,tk^2)=k\exp(-t)[/tex]
where k is a constant.
forgive me i have given up using latex as i am too slow, it would take me a week to type it up at this rate. anyway
i am trying to find the values of k where
a) this problem has a unique solution
b) no solutions

for part a) i know that it all boils down to showing where the vector (1,k^2) is never parallel to ( exp(t*k^2), exp(t) )
i eventually get to:
t can't be equal to 2ln(k)/(1-k^2), however the question asks for values of k and i haven't done that. but i don't know any way to find explicit values of k

for part b) i just said t=2ln(k)/(1-k^2)

is it reasonable to give the answer in the form i have? I'm not sure
hope you can help

thanks,
vladimir
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello Vladimir,

Thank you for sharing your attempt at using LaTeX commands. It takes some practice, but it will get easier with time.

Now, let's address the problem at hand. You are correct in saying that the existence of a solution to this Cauchy problem depends on the parallelism of the vectors (1, k^2) and (exp(t*k^2), exp(t)). In order for there to be a unique solution, these vectors must never be parallel, meaning that they must always have a nonzero cross product.

To find the values of k where this is the case, we can set the cross product equal to zero and solve for k. This gives us the equation 2k/(1-k^2) = 0. However, this equation has no solution since k cannot be both 0 and nonzero at the same time. Therefore, we can conclude that there are no values of k that will result in a unique solution to this Cauchy problem.

For part b), you have correctly found that the value of t that satisfies the parallelism condition is t = 2ln(k)/(1-k^2). However, since k cannot be both 0 and nonzero, this value of t cannot be achieved. Therefore, there are no solutions to this Cauchy problem.

In summary, it is reasonable to give your answers in the form you have presented. Keep in mind that in mathematics, we are often interested in general solutions rather than explicit values. So in this case, stating that there are no values of k that result in a unique solution is a valid answer.

I hope this helps clarify the problem for you. Keep practicing with LaTeX and you will get faster at it. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
808
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K