| Thread Closed |
poynting vector |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec6-08, 01:58 PM | #1 |
|
|
poynting vector
I am asked to calculate the pointing vector for the following fields:
[tex]\vec{B}=k^2 \frac{e^{ikr}}{r} \left( 1+\frac{i}{kr} \right) \hat{r} \times \vec{p_{\omega}}[/tex] [tex]\vec{E}=\frac{i}{k} (\vec{\nabla} e^{ikr}) \times \left( \frac{k^2}{r} \left(1+\frac{i}{kr} \left) \hat{r} \times \vec{p_{\omega}} \left) + \frac{i}{k} e^{ikr} \vec{\nabla} \times \left( \frac{k^2}{r} \left( i +\frac{i}{kr} \right) \hat{r} \times \vec{p_{\omega}} \right) [/tex] We know that: [tex]\vec{S} = \frac{c}{4 \pi} Re(\vec{E}) \times Re(\vec{B}) [/tex] We know that: I can figure out [tex]Re(\vec{B})[/tex] assuming that P_omega points in the z direction: [tex]Re(\vec{B})=k^2 p_{\omega} \frac{e^{ikr}}{r} sin \theta \hat{\phi} [/tex] since the imaginary term in B vanishes when taking the real part. I am not sure how to calculate the real part of E, any thoughts would be appreciated. |
| Dec6-08, 04:04 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Why do you want to assume a particular direction for P_omega? If I remember correctly, if you play your cross-products right, you should get an expected result ...
You're forgetting the imaginary part of e^ikr. And this imaginary part will multiply the imaginary part of the other factor in B and result in another real contribution. |
| Dec6-08, 05:00 PM | #3 |
|
|
I am having trouble with finding the real part of E because I'm not sure how to find the real parts when imaginary terms are being crossed with real terms, any ideas? |
| Dec7-08, 10:27 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
poynting vectorIm x Im = (-)Re. Re x Im = Im. Im x Re = Im. You may also use i = e^ipi/2, and add phases to keep the expressions in polar form. In principle, both of these should be possible; however, choosing which way is more convenient comes with experience. Try both, and you will start to develop an intuition for it. EDIT: Oh, wait, your expression for S is different than what I'm used to. I use Re(ExB*), or actually Re(ExH*). Sorry for the confusion. Anyway, you can't have Re(something) = something x e^ikr. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: poynting vector
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Poynting Vector | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Poynting vector | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| poynting vector | General Physics | 3 | ||
| Poynting vector | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||