What is the Unit of the Metric Tensor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the units of the metric tensor in the context of general relativity, particularly in relation to the cosmological constant and the momentum-energy tensor. Participants explore the implications of these units and their roles in the equations governing spacetime geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the metric tensor has no units, arguing that its components must fit into the distance formula without causing unit mismatches.
  • Another participant questions the consistency of units in the momentum-energy tensor, noting that it has components with different units, such as pressures and densities.
  • A participant elaborates on the significance of the metric in general relativity, describing its role in measuring angles and distances, and how it relates to the curvature of spacetime.
  • The mathematical properties of the metric tensor are discussed, including its rank and how it operates on tangent vectors to produce inner products.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the metric tensor has units, with some asserting it has none while others raise questions about the implications of unit discrepancies in related tensors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the units of the metric tensor.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the units of the metric tensor and the momentum-energy tensor, as well as the implications of these units in the context of general relativity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying general relativity, particularly in understanding the mathematical and conceptual foundations of the metric tensor and its applications in physics.

Antonio Lao
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
1
If the cosmological constant, [itex]\Lambda[/itex] has units of reciprocal time squared then what is the unit for the metric tensor, [itex]g_{ij}[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It has no units. A metric tensor in any coordinate can have no units, just look at how the components of a diagonal metric tensor fits into the distance formula, if it had units the units on the left would not match the units on the right.
 
franznietzsche,

Thanks. But I'm still not clear why the righthand side of Einstein's field equations, the momentum-energy tensor has components of different units (units in pressures, and units in densities).
 
Antonio Lao said:
I'm still not clear why the righthand side of Einstein's field equations, the momentum-energy tensor has components of different units (units in pressures, and units in densities).

Here is an excellent GR tutorial:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html


The METRIC is the star of general relativity. It describes everything about the geometry of spacetime, since it let's us measure angles and distances. Einstein's equation describes how the flow of energy and momentum through spacetime affects the metric. What it affects is something about the metric called the "curvature". The biggest job in learning general relativity is learning to understand curvature!

Mathematically, the metric g is a tensor of rank (0,2). It eats two tangent vectors v,w and spits out a number g(v,w), which we think of as the "dot product" or "inner product" of the vectors v and w. This let's us compute the length of any tangent vector, or the angle between two tangent vectors. Since we are talking about spacetime, the metric need not satisfy g(v,v) > 0 for all nonzero v. A vector v is SPACELIKE if g(v,v) > 0, TIMELIKE if g(v,v) < 0, and LIGHTLIKE if g(v,v) = 0.


The STRESS-ENERGY TENSOR. The stress-energy is what appears on the right side of Einstein's equation. It is a tensor of rank (0,2), and it defined as follows: given any two tangent vectors u and v at a point p, the number T(u,v) says how much momentum in the u direction is flowing through the point p in the v direction. Writing it out in terms of components in any coordinates, we have

T(u,v) = T_ab u^a v^b
 
Russell,

Thanks. Will start studying this GR tutorial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K