How Does Charge Density Variation Affect Integration in a Non-Conducting Sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter orthovector
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge enclosed within a non-conducting sphere with a variable charge density defined as ρ_E = ρ_o (r_1/r). The key conclusion is that the enclosed charge cannot be computed using the simplified equation q_enc = ρ_E * Volume due to the non-constant nature of ρ_E. Instead, the correct approach involves integrating the charge density over the volume, leading to the equation q_enc = ∫_V ρ_E dV. This highlights the importance of recognizing the variation in charge density when performing such calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of volume charge density and its implications in electrostatics.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, specifically in the context of physics.
  • Knowledge of Gauss's law and its application to non-uniform charge distributions.
  • Basic concepts of spherical coordinates and differential volume elements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Gauss's law for non-uniform charge distributions.
  • Learn about integrating variable charge densities in electrostatics.
  • Explore the concept of differential volume elements in spherical coordinates.
  • Investigate examples of charge distributions and their effects on electric fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to charge density and integration in non-conducting materials.

orthovector
Messages
115
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non conducting solid sphere with radius [tex]r_1[/tex] has charge density [tex]\rho_E = \rho_o \frac{r_1}^{r}[/tex]
what is the charge enclosed for [tex]0 < r < r_1[/tex] inside the non conducting sphere?

Homework Equations


[tex]\frac{q_{enc}}^{\frac{4}^{3}} \pi r^3}} = \rho_E = \frac{dq_{enc}}^{4 \pi r^2 dr}[/tex]

(1) [tex]\frac{4}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi r^3 \rho_E = q_{enc}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{4}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi r^3 \rho_o \frac{r_1}^{r}[/tex] [tex]= \frac{4}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi r^2 \rho_o r_1 = q_{enc}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{8}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi \rho_o r_1 r dr= dq_{enc}[/tex]
WHY CAN'T I TAKE THIS INTEGRAL TO FIND ENCLOSED CHARGE?
[tex]\int_{0}^{r} \frac{8}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi \rho_o r_1 r dr[/tex] = [tex]\int_{0}^{r} dq_{enc} = Q_{enc}[/tex]I KNOW I MUST put [tex]\rho_E = \rho_o \frac{r_1}^{r}[/tex] with [tex]dq_{enc} = 4 \pi r^2 dr[/tex] befofe i take the integral, but I'm not sure why (1) does not work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
orthovector said:
[tex]\frac{q_{enc}}^{\frac{4}^{3}} \pi r^3}} = \rho_E = \frac{dq_{enc}}^{4 \pi r^2 dr}[/tex]

Why would this be true?:confused:

How can [tex]\rho_E= \frac{q_{enc}}{\frac{4}{3} \pi r^3}[/tex] and [tex]\rho_E= \frac{dq_{enc}}{4 \pi r^2 dr}[/tex] both be true?

That would imply [tex]dq_{enc}=\frac{3q_{enc}}{r}[/tex] which would mean you have some with unit of charge on the LHS equal to something with units of charge over distance on the RHS...clearly one, or both of those equations is wrong!:smile:

(1) [tex]\frac{4}^{3}[/tex] [tex]\pi r^3 \rho_E = q_{enc}[/tex]

This would be true if [itex]\rho_E[/itex] was a constant; but it clearly isn't since it varies like 1/r.

Instead of messing around with all these jumbled equations, go back to the definition of volume charge density...what is that?

You should see that the charge enclosed by a volume [itex]\mathcal{V}[/itex] is always given by the equation [tex]q_{enc}=\int_{\mathcal{V}} \rho_E dV[/tex] where [itex]dV[/itex] is the differential volume element and [itex]\rho_E[/itex] is the charge density in that region.

In this case, [itex]\rho_E[/itex] is not constant throughout the volume and so you can't take it outside the integral. That means that [itex]q_{enc}\neq\rho_E *\text{Volume}[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K