Hypothesis testing

by engineer23
Tags: hypothesis, testing
engineer23 is offline
Mar24-09, 11:46 AM
P: 75
What is the difference between NOT being able to reject the hypothesis that a particular parameter is zero and being able to conclude that it is within some acceptable distance from zero ("practical equivalence")?

I guess this is more of a logic question, but I'm still having trouble understanding this distinction.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
Focus is offline
Mar24-09, 04:13 PM
P: 284
One of them says that the value is not zero, the other says it is. In hypothesis testing you never accept the null hypothesis, you only fail to reject it.

Is this what you were after?

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Hypothesis testing Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 4
Hypothesis testing Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Hypothesis Testing Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
question about hypothesis testing... Introductory Physics Homework 1
Hypothesis testing Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3