
#1
Apr2609, 02:52 AM

P: 730

This formula (E = V/d) has been used to derive the value of capacitance...but how is this applicable?...this is for point charges and here we're dealing with plates.
Any derivation to prove this is also applicable for plates? 



#2
Apr2609, 11:43 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

V = ∫ E dx is the equation for the potential difference between any two points. The plates (in a capacitor ) are only relevant for calculating E … E = D/ε, and D = Q/A. 



#3
Apr2709, 02:48 AM

P: 730

How can this be the potential difference?...it should be v_{1}  v_{2} 



#4
Apr2709, 03:08 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,721

Deriving value of capacitance using E = V/d
E = V/d is only valid is we have a constant potential/electric field. With a parallel plates, ignoring fringing effects, the electric field is approximately the same, hence the integral Edx is the same as Ed.
I'm not sure where you got E=V/d is for point charges or that V is only the potential brought from infinity. We are asking for the potential between the two plates, this inherently is asking for the potential difference. Referencing to bringing in from infinity is just another way to do potential difference by pinning infinity as your reference. Here, the reference is one of the plates. 



#5
Apr2709, 04:42 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

Hi dE_logics!
yes … V = Q/r is the Coulomb potential at distance r from a point charge Q, relative to zero potential defined at infinity … but that's because it's ∫ E dr along (any) path from ∞ to r (where of course E = Q/r^{2}). But the E field there is not the same as the E field for a capacitor … that comes from E = D/ε, and D = Q/A … and then you use V = ∫ E dr 



#6
Apr2709, 11:18 AM

P: 998

I worked this out, but I don't know where I stashed the sheet. I'll try to post it later tonight. The E = V/d is computed
by solving the Laplacian equation in 1 dimension, (del^2)V = 0 = Vxx + Vyy+ Vzz, where Vxx = (d^2)V/d(x^2), etc. In 1 dimension, x only, we have d2v/dx2 = 0. Integrating we obtain dV/dx = c1. Integrating again we get V(x) = c1*x + c2. The boundary conditions are V(0) = 0 & V(d) = V1, so that V(0) = 0 = c1*0 + c2 + c2, so that c2 = 0. Next V(d) = V1 = c1*d, which results in c1 = V1/d. Hence V(x) = (V1/d)*x. Then for static charges we know that E = grad V = dV/dx. But dV/dx = V1/d. Hence E = V1/d. V1 = voltage on 1 plate with 0V on the other. I'll attach a sheet later tonight. Claude 



#7
Apr2809, 02:09 AM

P: 730

The formula can be derived from v = kQ/r...where k is the dielectric stuff; this formula is applicable for a point charge, or a changing field, considering that E=V/d might not be applicable for a uniform field...I don't know...that's the question. 



#8
Apr2809, 02:32 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,721

E = V/d is only valid for point charges if you have a constant electric field, it is not a general equation. You are getting too caught up on the definition of potential. Potential difference is the work it takes to move point charge from A to B in an electric field. That is the potential difference between A and B. You are asking for the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor. This is derived specifically using the Laplacian equation as cabraham has worked out, but this assumes infinite plates. It is still a good estimate if you have large plates if you ignore fringing because the electric field is more or less constant between the plates.
But as for the intermediate step that E=V/d, V is defined as the potential difference between the plates. V is always potential difference and always requires a reference point. Sometimes we take infinite as the reference and use potential but that is generally chosen when we do not have a reference of consequence to use. When it comes to potential difference, it doesn't matter as the path for the potential from infinity can be made the same up until a desired point in space. 



#9
Apr2809, 02:38 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167





#10
Apr2809, 06:04 AM

P: 730

Humm...then my source is wrong!
Any links to derivation of V = ∫ E d(d) ?...and derivation of capacitance? (I'm searching) 



#11
Apr2809, 07:48 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,721





#12
Apr2809, 09:52 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

Two ways of defining voltage: voltage = energy/charge = work/charge = force"dot"distance/charge = (from the Lorentz force) electric field"dot"distance, or dV = E.dr but also voltage = energy/charge = (energy/time)/(charge/time) = power/current, or V = W/I 



#13
Apr2809, 10:47 PM

P: 730

Just confirm me one thing first, the expression ∫ E dr and Ed (= V) are different?




#14
Apr2809, 11:15 PM

Mentor
P: 11,255

The potential difference V between two points a and b, for onedimensional motion, is defined as
[tex]V =  \int_a^b {E(x) dx}[/tex] If E does not depend on x, then you can pull it out of the integral: [tex]V =  E \int_a^b {dx} =  E (b  a) =  E \Delta x[/tex] 



#15
Apr3009, 08:04 AM

P: 730

That means the 2 are the same.
If a is infinite we get V = Ed...right? 



#16
Apr3009, 08:06 AM

P: 730

Any links to derive capacitance of a parallel plate air capacitor?...pls?




#17
Apr3009, 08:35 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,721

If "a" is infinite, then the voltage would be infinite.
cabraham has the derivation, but I'm pretty sure it is derived in Griffith's text as well. 



#18
Apr3009, 09:05 AM

Mentor
P: 11,255




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
deriving F=ma? a vs F?  Introductory Physics Homework  6  
Deriving Equations  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Deriving µs = tan θ  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Deriving Big G  Advanced Physics Homework  5  
Deriving  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4 