Is Infinite Regression/Progression a Plausible Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wavelength
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theories of infinite regression and progression in the context of elementary particles. Infinite regression posits that splitting an elementary particle, such as an electron, yields even more fundamental particles, while infinite progression suggests our universe is merely an elementary particle within a larger universe. Participants note that elementary particles are defined as indivisible, challenging the validity of infinite regression. The conversation highlights the philosophical implications of these theories but concludes that they offer limited practical insight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elementary particle physics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of statistical interchangeability in physics
  • Basic grasp of philosophical implications in scientific theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and definitions of elementary particles in quantum physics
  • Explore the implications of quantum mechanics on the concept of indivisibility
  • Investigate philosophical theories related to infinite regression and progression
  • Study the statistical behavior of particles in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, and students interested in the foundational concepts of particle physics and the implications of infinite theories.

wavelength
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
what are your thoughts on the theory of infinite r/p
if you don't know what it is,
Infinite regression is the idea that if you split an electron (or whatever elementary particle) you get an even more elementary particle, if you split this particle you will get a more elementay particle and so on.
Infinite progression is the idea that our universe is just an elementary particle in an even vaster universe which, in turn, is itself an elementary particle and so on...
This idea has always intrigued me since i was a kid. (not that i am any less of a punk kid now)
P.S. sorry if "Progression" is the wrong word, but you get the idea!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect that this idea

has occurred to many of us, it certainly did to me. It's interesting but not very productive of insight.

When you try to "split" an electron all kinds of stuff falls out, but so far it's pretty much all been catalogued and it would be hard to describe them as "electron pieces".

The problem with the progression part is that "elementary particles" are statistically interchangable in a sense that can't really be described classicaly. The universes would have to be interchangeable too.
 
Originally posted by wavelength ...if you split an electron (or whatever elementary particle) you get an even more elementary particle...

Elementary particles are by definition not decomposable, i.e. if they can be split, they're not elementary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 163 ·
6
Replies
163
Views
29K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
14K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K