| Thread Closed |
For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May28-09, 10:58 PM | #1 |
|
|
For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?
If [itex]M[/itex] is a monoid and [itex]u,v\in M[/itex], and [itex]uv = 1[/itex], do we know [itex]vu = 1[/itex]? Can someone prove this or provide a counterexample? I tried to come up with one (a counterexample, that is) using 2 x 2 matrices but was unsuccessful.
|
| May29-09, 10:55 AM | #2 |
|
|
Assume:
[tex] uv=1[/tex] If there exists a w such that: [tex]vw=1[/tex] Then by associativity: [tex]w=1w=(uv)w=u(vw)=u1=u[/tex] Thus if such a w exists it must be u. This isn't quite enough but I can't find a short proof either. I'll think on it. |
| May29-09, 12:49 PM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The canonical example is left and right shift of a sequence or countable dimensional vector space.
L(a,b,c,d,...) = (b,c,d,....) R(a,b,c,..)=(0,a,b,c...) LR=id, and RL=/=id. You won't find one in 2x2 matrices - the invertible ones form a group, so there's no point looking. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring. | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 5 | ||
| prove that inv(G) is a group. G is a monoid... | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 6 | ||