Thread Closed

For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May28-09, 10:58 PM   #1
 

For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?


If [itex]M[/itex] is a monoid and [itex]u,v\in M[/itex], and [itex]uv = 1[/itex], do we know [itex]vu = 1[/itex]? Can someone prove this or provide a counterexample? I tried to come up with one (a counterexample, that is) using 2 x 2 matrices but was unsuccessful.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
May29-09, 10:55 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 6
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Assume:
[tex] uv=1[/tex]
If there exists a w such that:
[tex]vw=1[/tex]
Then by associativity:
[tex]w=1w=(uv)w=u(vw)=u1=u[/tex]
Thus if such a w exists it must be u.

This isn't quite enough but I can't find a short proof either. I'll think on it.
 
May29-09, 12:49 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
The canonical example is left and right shift of a sequence or countable dimensional vector space.

L(a,b,c,d,...) = (b,c,d,....)

R(a,b,c,..)=(0,a,b,c...)

LR=id, and RL=/=id.

You won't find one in 2x2 matrices - the invertible ones form a group, so there's no point looking.
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?
Thread Forum Replies
Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring. Linear & Abstract Algebra 5
prove that inv(G) is a group. G is a monoid... Linear & Abstract Algebra 6