Thread Closed

Fundamental Frequency!!!

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun20-09, 04:31 AM   #1
 

Fundamental Frequency!!!


A nylon string is stretched between fixed supports 0.75m apart. Experimental plucking of the string shows that several standing waves can exist on the string. Two such standing waves have frequencies of 225Hz and 300Hz with no other frequencies in between.

Q1. What is the lowest frequency (fundamental) frequency that can exist on the string?

I tried to use f=v/2L = Root(t/m/L)/2L
But the tension and mass was not given. I'm pretty sure that would have something to do with those frequencies provided. But I have no clue of how to do it.

Thanks ^^
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Jun20-09, 04:35 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by rchenkl View Post
A nylon string is stretched between fixed supports 0.75m apart. Experimental plucking of the string shows that several standing waves can exist on the string. Two such standing waves have frequencies of 225Hz and 330Hz with no other frequencies in between.

Q1. What is the lowest frequency (fundamental) frequency that can exist on the string?

I tried to use f=v/2L = Root(t/m/L)/2L
But the tension and mass was not given. I'm pretty sure that would have something to do with those frequencies provided. But I have no clue of how to do it.

Thanks ^^
Welcome to Physics Forums.

HINT: How is the frequency of the nth harmonic related to the fundamental mode?
Jun20-09, 04:40 AM   #3
 
Quote by Hootenanny View Post
Welcome to Physics Forums.

HINT: How is the frequency of the nth harmonic related to the fundamental mode?
fn=nv/2L So is it when n=1 its the first harmonic? And its the fundamental frequency?
I'm not sure very sure...
Jun20-09, 04:47 AM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Fundamental Frequency!!!


Quote by rchenkl View Post
fn=nv/2L So is it when n=1 its the fundamental frequency?
I was thinking more of something of the form fn = n*f1, where fn is the nth harmonic and f1 is the fundamental frequency.

Can you use this expression together with the information provided to create a system of two equations?
Jun20-09, 04:56 AM   #5
 
Quote by Hootenanny View Post
I was thinking more of something of the form fn = n*f1, where fn is the nth harmonic and f1 is the fundamental frequency.

Can you use this expression together with the information provided to create a system of two equations?
So is it 225Hz=nf1 and 300Hz=(n+1)f1 ?
Throught my calculations....
So f1=300-225?
Jun20-09, 04:57 AM   #6
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by rchenkl View Post
So is it 225Hz=nf1 and 300Hz=(n+1)f1 ?
Throught my calculations....
So f1=300-225?
Looks good to me
Jun20-09, 04:58 AM   #7
 
Ohh ! I got it!!!
Because the Nth frequency is the n*fundamental frequency!
Is that right?
Jun20-09, 05:00 AM   #8
 
Thank u !!! :D
Jun20-09, 05:38 AM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Okay, exactly what answer did you get? It does NOT follow that because [itex]225= n*f_1[/itex], that 330 must be the next harmonic. [itex]330= m*f_1[/itex], certainly, but m is not necessarily n+1.

330- 225= 105. But 105 is NOT a divisor of 330: that is, 330 is not equal to n*105 for any integer n so 105 is NOT the "fundamental frequency". What is true is that [itex]f_n= n*f_1[/itex] so the fundamental frequence must be a factor of both 330 and 225 (and, so, 105). 330= 3*110= 3*5*22= 2*3*5*11. 225= 5*45= 5*5*9= 32*52. What is the largest number that divides both of those?
(Even then there is no guarentee that a fundamental frequency is the greatest common factor. There four possible fundamental frequencies for this.
Jun20-09, 08:08 AM   #10
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
Okay, exactly what answer did you get? It does NOT follow that because [itex]225= n*f_1[/itex], that 330 must be the next harmonic. [itex]330= m*f_1[/itex], certainly, but m is not necessarily n+1.

330- 225= 105. But 105 is NOT a divisor of 330: that is, 330 is not equal to n*105 for any integer n so 105 is NOT the "fundamental frequency". What is true is that [itex]f_n= n*f_1[/itex] so the fundamental frequence must be a factor of both 330 and 225 (and, so, 105). 330= 3*110= 3*5*22= 2*3*5*11. 225= 5*45= 5*5*9= 32*52. What is the largest number that divides both of those?
(Even then there is no guarentee that a fundamental frequency is the greatest common factor. There four possible fundamental frequencies for this.
Sorry to cause confusing there. The two frequencies provided was supposed to be 225 Hz and 300 Hz. Not 330 Hz for the second one.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Fundamental Frequency!!!
Thread Forum Replies
fundamental frequency and changes to it Introductory Physics Homework 2
Fundamental frequency Introductory Physics Homework 3
Fundamental Frequency Introductory Physics Homework 7
Fundamental Frequency Introductory Physics Homework 3
Fundamental Frequency Advanced Physics Homework 2