Popularity of Nomenclature: PF Reader Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature Poll
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the popularity and viability of various nomenclatures in particle physics, specifically the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) and the Two Higgs Doublet Model (THDM). Participants highlight that the MSSM remains a significant theory in high-energy physics, as evidenced by ongoing searches and exclusion plots published by the Particle Data Group. The discussion also notes a lack of attention towards the 68 GeV events measured by LEP, attributed to their incompatibility with the MSSM.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM)
  • Familiarity with the Two Higgs Doublet Model (THDM)
  • Knowledge of high-energy physics search methodologies
  • Awareness of particle data evaluation practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) in current particle physics
  • Explore the Two Higgs Doublet Model (THDM) and its experimental relevance
  • Investigate the latest exclusion plots related to MSSM from the Particle Data Group
  • Examine the significance of the 68 GeV events measured by LEP in the context of MSSM
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students interested in the viability of theoretical models like MSSM and THDM.

which of these expressions are known to you?


  • Total voters
    16
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
203
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have to confess that I hadn't heard about the Higgs doublet and also about the THDM (Two Higgs Doublet model). I hope to have passed the test though :biggrin:

Do you happen to know if the Minimal supersymmetric standard model is actually considered like a viable theory? There's not much discussion about it at PF.
 
Last edited:
Mssm

As far as one can read from the particle data group, it keeps being one of the main theories under consideration. If you go across the evaluation of searches in high energy physics, you will notice that the particles coming from the MSSM are currenntly given more emphasis than, for example, the ones coming from grand unyfied models. For the MSSM a huge range of plots about exclusion areas is done.

In the last year I am afraid that one motivation to dismiss research in the 68 GeV events measured by LEP was -IMHO- that they were not compatible with the minimal supersymmetric model.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K