Essai: try to define the state of aparticle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 11137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on a theoretical approach to defining the state of a particle in four-dimensional spacetime, utilizing concepts such as the Christoffel's cube, the electromagnetic (EM) field tensor, and relative acceleration. The author proposes a method that simplifies the description of particles satisfying the Lorentz equations of motion using five matrices, drawing parallels to the Pauli connection between relativity and quantum theory. The lack of responses indicates a potential disconnect with the broader scientific community regarding this theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-dimensional spacetime concepts
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz equations of motion
  • Knowledge of the electromagnetic field tensor
  • Basic grasp of matrix mathematics in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Christoffel symbols and their applications in general relativity
  • Study the electromagnetic field tensor in the context of classical electrodynamics
  • Explore the Pauli matrices and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate higher-dimensional theories in physics, including string theory
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics and relativity, and anyone interested in alternative approaches to particle physics and spacetime theories.

member 11137
I hope it is the right place to ask such question (theory development); and if not: pardon me.
What you can read here is a kind of test of my own theory. It should be sympathic if someone could tell me if it is a wrong way to think. I try to built a new method to describe the state of a particle moving in space time (4-dimensional). I replace the usual way to do by what I call the Christoffel's cube, the EM field tensor and the relative acceleration. I need four of my splittings. Do you think it could offer a usefull alternative to some other methods asking for space with 5,...36 dimensions?
Thanks for your opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I forgot the attachment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just want to say thank you to all (about 35) members who have taken a little bit of their time to look this thread (updated on my webpage; see news: part 02 on www.alititi.privat.t-online.de[/URL]). The result of my work is that we could describe any particle satisfying the Lorentz equations of motion with "only" 5 matrix (4-4)(a little bit like in the Pauli connection between relativity and quantum theory). The absence of answer and communication about this thread certainly prove the stupidity of my essay. Sure I am disappointed but so it is.Thx
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Graduate The Quantum State as a Function of The Quantum Field
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Graduate Consistent Histories and Locality
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
Graduate Solving for a steady-state (passive cable equation)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Ballentine on the "multicomponent state function"
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate A Universal picture of hadron interactions?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
An example of state determination (Ballentine Problem 8.4)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Trying To Calculate Christoffel Symbols
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Graduate Ground state energy of cube-like potential wells
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Graduate Can anyone give me the details of creating a cat state in Circuit QED?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K